Unite to expose the traitor Communists

via Raghavan Nair published on November 17, 2006

While the UPA government and its mentor the Communist parties are readying for a red carpet welcome to Chinese President Hu Jinato, China vehemently rejected India’s stand on Arunachal Pradesh and preferred to term it as `disputed territory’ and not to recognize as Indian territory. Such a stand from the Chinese authorities on the eve of their President’s visit once again demonstrates their arrogance while dealing with Indian authorities and the faith they have about the efficiency of their `cadre’ in India.  Dialogues between India and China on the disputed territory have been going since 2003 and already eight rounds of talks in this regard had taken place, with little headway in reaching a settlement.  It is expected that during the forthcoming Chinese President’s visit also, there could be dialogues in this direction.


 


Another important issue expected to be come up for discussion during the Chinese President’s visit could be about the controversial Chinese plan that involves damming the Brahmaputra river and diverting 200 billion cubic meters of water annually to feed the ageing yellow river. The project plans to take the diverted water to feed north-eastern China watering Shaanxi, Hebei, Beijing and Tianjin areas.  If this project called `Greater Western Water Diversion Project’ goes through, it could strangle one of India’s and Bangladesh’s biggest sources of water.


 


Sitaram Yetchuri and his `ever vigilant’ gang has no say about these issues, but are busy in finalizing deals for bringing thousands of Chinese Labours to India and awarding the Vizhinjam Harbour project to the Chinese company. The disputed Indian Territory at northern frontier or the dam that comes up in Brahmaputra is of little concern to them. Because, they still hold the view that the Chinese aggression of 1965 was legitimate and all along they have been towing the same line. In fact, they are dreaming of that day when whole Indian continent turn Red and without Chinese aid and abetment, that dream could not be fulfilled.


 


It is relevant to quote what Guruji Golwalker said in 1951.  He said China is expansionist in nature and is very likely to attack Bharat soon.  It has been a terribly blunderous act to gift away Tibet to China.  It is one blunder that even the British dis not commit”   


 


 

Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.

Your comments, please.

Responses

  1. Anonymous Reply

    November 17, 2006 at 1:53 pm

    Re: Unite to expose the traitor Communists
    The CPI(M) recognises China’s unprecedented potential
    to challenge US supremacy.The CPI(M) is actively colluding
    with the Chinese in this international power struggle.
    Despite China’s war with India, it has been supporting China
    in this world power game.

    It is evident from an array of CPI(M)’s pro-China policies, such as going all out to canvass for Chinese industry, even those concerning natural national security objections, and siding with the Chinese position on Arunachal Pradesh.

    This communist perfidy is old. It goes back before Independence, when they opposed the freedom movement, because Britain was the Soviet Union’s war-time ally. Their treacherous conduct during and after the India-China war is also well known.

    China has always tried to keep India down since the creation of Pakistan.
    The bottom line is that, the CPI(M) has no use for Indian-style democracy.
    They prefers the Maoists of various shades. It is no surprise that it sided
    with the Nepal Maoists against Indian national interest and against the
    larger interests of Nepal. CPI(M) and China have never spoken about
    Pakistani Terrorism in India nor condemned it at any time

    Their coming now openly in favour of China is calculated to tilt the power balance. By their support to China, if Chinese succeed in International power game the CPI(M) succeed in India and Indian sovereignty and democratic system is threatened. 5

  2. H.Balakrishnan Reply

    November 17, 2006 at 11:18 pm

    Re: Unite to expose the traitor Communists
    DEAR SIR,
    Compliments for an excellent expose of the ‘comrades’.They are the ‘TROJAN HORSES’ in our BHARATAHAM.I have no doubts on that score.History chronicles this!I am appending below the ‘thoughts’ of M.N.Roy,the founder of the CPI in the 1920s.These are excerpted fro the ‘INTELLECTUAL KSHATRIYA’-SHRI SITA RAM GOEL’S “PERVERSION OF INDIA’S POLITICAL PARLANCE”-VOICE OF INDIA,NEW DELHI.This gives us an idea of the ‘thought process’ of the Karats/Yechureys/Brinda Karats et al!!

    NAMASKARAMS

    WARM REGARDS

    H.Balakrishnan
    ————————————————————–
    “ THE HISTORY OF LEFTIST LANGUAGE.”

    1. “ The first major spokesman of the Leftist language for India was M.N.Roy in his ‘INDIA in TRANSITION’ which was published from Paris in 1922. He formulated in this book practically all the slogans which have been the stock-in trade of the Leftists ever since. Of course, he was not the inventor of the lore. ‘HE HAD LEARNT IT FROM LENIN’.

    “ FUNDAMENTAL FORMULATIONS OF ROY.”

    “ M.N.Roy had been sent abroad by the Bengal revolutionaries in 1915 in search of German arms. The Germans did not live upto the promises they had made, and Roy wandered away through China and Japan into the U.S.A. where he was positively impressed by the modern Western Civilization. Next, he went to Mexico where he came in contact with Communist thought. That cured him completely of whatever love was still left in him for India’s ancient culture. Finally, he landed in the Soviet Union in 1920, and became a ‘confidant’ of Lenin. He functioned as a leading luminary of the COMMUNIST INTERNATIONALE’ for several years.

    5. “ A few years later, Roy had to flee from the Soviet Union where serious charges had been leveled against him, including embezzlement of huge funds meant for ‘FINANCING A COMMUNIST REVOLUTION IN INDIA’. He was ‘recruited’ by the British Intelligence, brought to India under the cover of a revolutionary avoiding arrest, put in jail for a few years, and hoisted up as a martyr. ‘HE WAS MEANT TO SERVE AS AN IDEOLOGICAL BULLET AIMED MAINLY AT MAHATMA GANDHI. EVER SINCE, THE ONLY HARDWARE THAT REMAINED IN HIS HANDS WAS HIS PEN, WHICH HE PLIED WITH GREAT PROWESS.”

    6. “ Roy pronounced as follows on ‘INDIA’S HISTORY, CULTURE, PEOPLE, AND, POLITICS :

    – At the time of the British conquest, that is, towards the middle of the 18th century, the economic and political evolution of India was such that her people could be called ‘RATHER A NUMBER OF NATIONALITIES INHABITING A CONTINENT THAN A COMPOSITE NATIONAL UNIT. (REF: G. ADHIKARI (ed), ‘DOCUMENTS OF THE HISTORY OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF INDIA, NEW DELHI, 1971, pp 382. ( MY COMMENT: ALL THAT FOLLOWS IN THIS SUB-PARA ARE QUOTED FROM THE SAME DOCUMENT.) ( EVEN TODAY SITARAM YECHURY SAYS THE SAME THING AND SO DOES MARXIST HISTORIAN ROMILLA THAPER-DETAILS AVAILABLE IN DR. KOENRAAD ELST’S ‘DECOLONISING THE HINDU MIND’.)

    – The Revolt of 1857 was a ‘reactionary flare-up of ‘decadent feudalism. Socially it was a ‘reactionary movement’ because it wanted to replace British Rule by the revival of ‘FEUDAL IMPERIALISM’ EITHER OF THE MOGHULS OR THE MARATHAS. (pp 383.)

    – The overwhelming majority of the population lived in villages, steeped in ignorance and submerged in social stagnation. Politics, forms of government, National subjugation or freedom remained outside their concern and beyond their comprehension. (pp 383.)

    – THE ONLY SECTION OF THE PEOPLE SHOWING ANY SIGN OF LIFE WAS THE MODERN INTELLECTUALS EDUCATED IN WESTERN METHODS AND THOUGHTS. THESE ‘DENATIONALISED’ INTELLECTUALS WERE INSTRUEMENTAL IN BRINGING TO INDIA, ‘FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HER LONG EVENTFUL HISTORY, POLITICAL PATRIOTISM. (pp 383-384)

    -The constitutional democracy or the ‘EVOLUTIONARY NATIONALISM’ advocated by the ‘LIBERAL BOURGEOISE’ led by the intellectuals spelled doom to the old social heritage and religious orthodoxy. And these ‘REVOLUTIONARY FORCES’ were crystallizing in the Congress under ‘radical leaders’ whose programme was NOT to revive the India of the ‘rishis’ with its contented handicraft workers saturated with ignorance and dosed in the name of ‘religion’, but to build a ‘NEW SOCIETY’ on the ‘RUINS OF THE OLD’. (pp 389-390).

    -The struggle of the ‘RADICAL INTELLIGENTSIA’ was not against an effete and antiquated political institution but for the ‘DEMOCRATISATION OF THE EXISTING GOVERNMENT WHICH’- – – was the ‘MOST ADVANCED THE COUNTRY HAD TILL THEN. (pp 384)

    -‘ORTHODOX NATIONALISM’, in the social sense, ‘WAS THE RESISTANCE OF FORCES OF REACTION AGAINST THE OMINOUS RADICALISM OF THE DENATIONALISED INTELLECTUALS WHO LED THE CONGRESS’. The same forces whose military explosion was the Mutiny of 1857, ‘COULD BE DISCOVERED BEHIND THE POLITICAL THEORIES OF THE ORTHODOX NATIONALISM OF HALF A CENTURY LATER. (pp 390)

    -Although its political philosopher and leader were found subsequently in the persons of AUROBINDO GHOSE and BIPIN CHANDRA PAL, respectively, ‘ITS FUNDAMENTAL IDEOLOGY WAS CONCEIVED BY A YOUNG INTELLECTUAL OF PETIT-BOURGEOIS ORIGIN. HE WAS NARENDRA NATH DUTT SUBSEQUENTLY KNOWN BY THE RELIGIOUS NOMENCLATURE OF SWAMI VIVEKANANDA- – -. LIKE TILAK, DUTT WAS ALSO A PROPHET OF HINDU NATIONALISM. HE WAS ALSO A BELIEVER IN THE CULTURAL SUPERIORITY OF THE INDIAN PEOPLE, AND HELD THAT ON THIS CULTURAL BASIS SHOULD BE BUILT THE FUTURE INDIAN NATION.’ ‘HE PREACHED THAT HINDUISM, NOT INDIAN NATIONALISM, SHOULD BE AGGRESSIVE. HIS NATIONALISM WAS A SPIRITUAL IMPERIALISM’. (pp 391-392)

    -Thus an intelligently rebellious element which otherwise would have been the vanguard of the ‘exploited class’ in a social struggle, had to give in to national pre-occupations and contribute itself to a movement for the immediate overthrow of foreign rule, NOT FOR PROGRESS FORWARD, BUT IN ORDER TO GO BACK TO AN IMAGINARY GOLDEN AGE, THE FOUNTAIN-HEAD OF INDIA’S SPIRITUAL HERITAGE.’ ‘IN THEIR RELIGIOUSNESS AND WILD SPIRITUAL IMPERIALISM, THEY EMBODIED THE REACTIONARY SOCIAL FORCES.’ (pp 393)

    -The ‘extremists’, now called ‘NON-COOPERATORS’, have had better success than the ‘MODERATES’ in drawing the masses under the influence of NATIONALISM—. But they could not develop the potentiality of the mass movement by leading it in accordance with the economic urges and social tendencies. Their tactics was to strengthen the nationalist movement by the questionable method of ‘exploiting’ the ignorance of the masses. AND THE BEST WAY OF EXPLOITING THE IGNORANCE OF THE MASSES WAS TO MAKE A RELIGION OF ‘NATIONALISM’. ‘THIS TACTICS LED TO THE APPEARANCE OF MOHAN DAS KARAMCHAND GANDHI ON THE POLITICAL HORIZON, AND THE ECLIPSE OF ALL OTHER POLITICO-SOCIAL TENDENCIES IN THE SHADE OF GANDHISM’. (pp 394)

    -‘IN GANDHISM CULMINATE ALL THE SOCIAL TENDENCIES THAT HAVE ALWAYS DIFFERENTIATED THE PRINCIPAL TENDENCIES OF INDIAN NATIONALISM. IN FACT, GANDHISM IS THE ACUTEST AND MOST DESPERATE MANIFESTATION OF THE FORCES OF REACTION TRYING TO HOLD THEIR OWN AGAINST THE OBJECTIVELY REVOLUTIONARY TENDENCIES CONTAINED IN THE LIBERAL BOURGEOIS NATIONALISM. THE IMPENDING WANE OF GANDHISM SIGNIFIES THE COLLAPSE OF THE REACTIONARY FORCES AND THEIR TOTAL ELIMINATION FROM THE POLITICAL MOVEMENT’. (pp 394-395)

    -ALTHOUGH SOMEWHAT UNIQUE IN ITS IDIOSYNCRASIES AND FANATICISM, THE GANDHI CULT IS NOT AN INNOVATION. DIVESTED OF THE REBELLIOUS SPIRIT AND THE SHREWD POLITICIAN IN HIM, TILAK WOULD RESEMBLE GANDHI IN SO FAR AS RELIGIOUS BELIEF AND SPIRITUAL PREJUDICES ARE CONCERNED. BUT FOR HIS VERSATALITY IN MODERN THOUGHT AND CHARACTERISTIC LOOSENESS OF CONVICTION, BIPIN CHANDRA PAL WOULD PERCHANCE JOIN THE MAHATMA IN THE PASSIONATE DENUNCIATION OF EVERYTHING THAT ADDS TO THE MATERIAL COMFORT OF MAN.’ HAD HE BEEN MORE OF A MONOMANIAC THAN A PROFOUND THINKER WITH METAPHYSICAL PREOCCUPATIONS, AUROBINDO GHOSE WOULD SUBS

Latest Articles from Divisive Agenda

Did You Know?