Unite against host Hindu community in India – Advices Archbishop of Canterbury

Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams is on a working  tour of India since Oct. 9th. His primary business is church business and consolidating church interests in India.

This is the same Archbishop who advised the British government to recognise Shariah as a valid  legal justice system in England. But he does not hold similar sympathies for Hindu religious traditions.

Archbishop Dr. Williams in his public statements has already offended Hindus as best he can, by asking the various warring Christian churches to unite against the violence of the host Hindu community in India.

“Sustained violence against Christians in India has helped different denominations to bridge differences and heed the Good Shepherd’s voice,” he told a meeting of 1,200 church delegates in Nagpur on October 14th.

This statement is absurd. There is no sustained violence against Christians in India today and there has never been any at any time. The Archbishop is repeating a foul lie probably on the advice of his devious Catholic counterpart in New Delhi. He would like Hindus to be put on the defensive because his own position is very weak.

When communal violence occurs between Hindus and  Christian converts who have been alienated from their traditions and native society (as has happened inKandhamal), it is the converts who initiate the violence and the Hindus who respond. This has been found to be true in every case without exception.

Throughout history Christians have deliberately provoked violence against themselves and then capitalized on the result, presenting themselves to the world as innocent victims and  martyrs who have been unjustly attacked. But a close examination of violence against Christians exposes them as the instigators of the violence for their own selfish benefit. They believe in a martyred god and must become martyred like him.

The Archbishop Sahib is trying to create misunderstanding and hatred between Christians and the host Hindu community with his mischievous remarks.

He is to meet Hindu sadhus in Bangalore on Oct. 20th. According to a Press Release he is to meet five Hindu Swamis at Whitefield Ecumenial Centre. They will speak in private for two hours and then give a public presentation together before responding to questions from the audience.

His Holiness Sri Sri Sri Tridandi Srimannarayana Ramanuja Chinna Jeeyar Swamiji, Sri Vaishnava , Founder of Jeeyar Educational Trust
(JET), Hyderabad. His Holiness 1008 Sri Sri Sugunendra Theertha Swamiji, Dvaita, Shri Puthige Matha, Udupi. Srimat Swami Harshanandaji, President of Ramakrishna Math, Bangalore. Sri Taralabalu Jagadguru Dr Shivamurthy Shivacharya Mahaswamiji, Lingayat.
Swami Paramananda Bharati, Dashanami, Sringeri Math.Chair: Professor Chakravarthi Ram-Prasad, Lancaster University, U.K.

According to the Press Release , This dialogue is at the invitation of the Archbishop of Canterbury to respected teachers and leaders of Hindu sampradayas/traditions to engage in discussions for mutual understanding.

From its inception at the Second Vatican Council til today, inter-religious dialogue has been used as an instrument of proselytization of the heathen and nothing else.  The invitation to such a dialogue by a Christian leader has always been insincere. And the dialogues themselves have never served the Hindu interest.

When Christian missionaries are still engaged in their war on Hinduism, alienating the people from their families and native traditions with money and false promises of salvation, how is it possible for Hindu representatives to sit and talk about “visions of the divine” and “social harmony” with the Archbishop of Canterbury or any other Christian leader?

Hindu representatives who engage in these inter-religious dialogues are either simpletons and fools who live in Cloud-Cuckoo-Land. Or they are quislings who have been paid by the Church to subvert and undermine their own community. They are either of these; there is no third kind!

Church of England divines were right in the middle of the thievery. Besides the dirty books they printed about Hindu Gods on their new printing presses, there are government records that show that almost all churches in Kerala received landsmisappropriated from temples during the British regime. These lands have never been returned to their rightful owners, the deities of the dispossessed temples.
There was also the temple-breaking. Not so much as that perpetrated by the Roman Catholic priests roaming around the countryside looking for converts and little boys, but a few incidents high-profile enough to be remembered.

There was the removal of the Hindu shrines from within the Fort St. George campus because they offended the sensibilities of the British officials who lived there; there was the occupation of the temples of Triplicane and Mylapore by troops when theBritish and French were fighting; there was the confiscation of the beautifulJalakanteeswara Shiva Temple in Vellore Fort — the image had been removed earlier either by or because of the threat posed by the Nawabs of Arcot — and its use by British troops as a stable for horses; there was the firing on the Kalahasti temples by British troops in order to intimidate the local people; there was the removal of theMumbai Devi Temple from its mulastan to its present location to facilitate the building of Victoria Terminus in Mumbai.

There is more to the list but this is enough to make our point to the visiting White Sahib.

Perhaps more criminal than these visible attacks on Hindus was the vast quantity of vile and perverted literature produced by Church of England missionaries against Hinduism— Brahmins were (and are) targeted by missionaries because they are the custodians of Hindu culture and are not easily converted. Ziegenbalg was one of the first to produce anti-Hindu religious pornography on his imported printing press at Tranquebar. But the Christian publisher ISPCK in Delhi, a colonial institution the Archbishop is today praising to the skies, also produced a lot of this missionary garbage.

So the Lord Archbishop Sahib is on the warpath. He is not repentant of past crimes perpetrated by his predecessors and Church of England  missionaries in British India. He has already taken the offensive and accused Hindus in Nagpur of “sustained violence against Christians”. What then is he going to say to the Swamijis in Whitefield before he offers them their bags of ‘dakshina’?

The Archbishop should get down off his high horse; indeed, he should get down on his knees before Mother India.  She is about to be recognised a world power — again! —  while his own depraved country, England, has been recognised as the favourite catamite of US presidents. England  and the English Church has become the laughingstock of the world.

The Archbishop of Canterbury owes Hindus an abject, unconditional apology for the crimes — those past and those still being contemplated — of his missionaries and countrymen in India.

And if the Archbishop is really a man of God as some of his guided followers believe, then he will give an unequivocal undertaking to stop the conversion of Hindus in India from today. If he is a sincere and good man — and he may be — he will give this commitment to his Hindu guests in Whitefield before he gives them their bags of money.

As for the Swamijis themselves, before they accept the Archbishop’s gifts they must demand a commitment from him to give up the harvesting of souls in India for the duration of all time. Religious conversion isdestroying the social fabricof Mother India and must stop.
What say the Swamijis? They are the representatives of Sanatana Dharma at this dubious conference and are answerable to the Hindu community at large. Or are they?

Read Full Report at
http://bharatabharati.wordpress.com/2010/10/15/the-archbishop-of-canterbury-owes-hindus-an-abject-apology-swami-devananda-saraswati/

Responses