Why the Media cry, only when Hindu’s retaliate?

The very same National and International  medias who made a hue and cry for the Gujarat’s retaliation to Godhra, showed it’s true colour of Hindu hatredness once again today. 

The National Headings of many medias goes like this ‘Hindu activist’s riot in Bangalore’, ‘RSS rally turns violent in Bangalore’ !

Why this onesided reporting only when Hindus retaliate? If the root cause of Gujarat was Godhra carnage, in Bangalore it was the Jehadi attack on Hindu temples in Shivaji Nagar area and Bharthi Nagar area by the fanatic mob who rallied to sympathize for the lost cause of a dictator’s death!

Whether the media expect Hindus still to stick on to ‘Ahimsa’ when their temples are torched and the banners of our functions are destroyed by the Jehadis?

A senior swayamsevak was brutally murdered by the Jehadi terrorists in Kerala and a Harthal was called on in the Malappuram district. This gruesome murder of a patriot was no news to the Pseudosecular media but the media cried â€˜Muslim hacked in RSS Harthal’. Why this cry only when the Muslim blood is spilled?

History says majority of riots since ancient times were initiated by the Jehadi’s either by stoning a Hindu procession, attacking temples, exploding bombs, killing Hindus and so on.. But the Media opens their eyes only when the tolerant Hindus takes the arms in their hand for self protection!

If the fanatic Muslims sets off attack on temples and Hindus, media reports it as ‘Communal Clash’ When the Hindus retaliates there, they cries “Violent Hindus Killed Muslims”!!

Responses