Mathrubhumi Exposed

It’s a fact that Mathrubhumi is one of the front-runners among the Malayalam newspapers subscribed and supported by Hindus in Kerala. The Daily renowned for it’s Nationalistic outlook was conceived as the mouthpiece of

India

’s freedom movement in Kerala. But off late the daily slips away from it’s Nationalistic leanings in it’s blind run to compete with Manorama in subscription advertisement.

 

For a daily with a National view it’s not at all difficult to distinguish between who is FAKE and who is REAL Sankaracharya of Puri. Especially when there were already many furore over the issue nationally and internationally.

 

05.08.2008 Mathrubhumi Edition comes out with the following News

 

http://www.mathrubhumi.com/php/newsDetails.php?news_id=1242159&n_type=HO&category_id=4&Farc=&previous=Y

 

The News story goes like this – Modi Behind Surat Bombs- Puri Sankaracharya –  The Daily which says it’s motto as ‘Sathyam- Samthwam- Swathantryam’ – Reports the venom spitting by a Fake person who claims himself as
Puri Sankaracharya!!

 

Will Mathrubhumi dare to publish similar reports without confirming the genuinity , if some one ridicules Christianity claiming as Arch Diose of Mumbai or Some one ridiculing Islam claiming as Delhi Imam ?

 

Haven’t Mathrubhumi got enough Journalists to find out who this Fraudster is or is this the latest way of reporting to increase the subscription by ridiculing Modi?

 

All four Sankaracharyars had issued several press release on various issues like Ramsethu, Amarnath issue, Ramjanmabhumi issue and so on at various times- Never we saw Mathrubhumi carrying such calls by genuine Sankaracharyas but here they go over the top by publishing a report from a fraudster feigning as Puri sankaracharya.

 

For the kind notice of Mathrubhumi – Puri sankaracharya is Swami Nishcalananda Sarasvati and not as you claims Adhokshajanand

 

Related Links

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Govardhana_matha

 

http://www.ivarta.com/cause/IC11_SCharya.htm

 

http://www.hinduonnet.com/2000/09/06/stories/14062195.htm

Responses