Woman entry to Sabarimala : False affidavit submitted to Supreme Court
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The affidavit submitted to Supreme Court by the Kerala government stating Amma Maharani (Queen) visited Sabarimala at the age of 38 is totally untrue, said Uthradam Thirunal Marthandavarma. “Amma Maharani visited Sabrimala at the age of 50 and I was very young at that timeâ€, he told the media people.
He also slammed present Government for not providing any facilities during Cherukolppuzha Hindu convention but the same Government provides all facilities to Maraman Convention organized by the Christians near to it!
The Government which subsidy for Hajj pilgrims and makes the arrangements for it whole heartedly, ignores Ayyappa devotees and claims what they do is a Charity for Hindus!
If anyone dares to propose a woman Pope, he will be beaten up. If anyone advocates Namaz (Muslim prayer) of women along with Muslim men, fatwas will be issued from all corners as they won’t tolerate any interference in their religion by Non Believers
He appeals to all Hindus to unite and oppose this injustice to protect our culture and for our own continued existence. The Government keep a distance from other Religions and Humiliate Hindus because of the unity of others and disarray among Hindus
Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.
Latest Articles from Bharath Focus
- Narendra Modi: The Architect of India’s Momentous Transformation
- Republic Day Tableaux & Regional Pride
- Tarun Vijay meets Governor Arif Khan on Adi Sankara birthplace
- SC-ST പോസ്റ്റ് മെട്രിക് സ്കോളർഷിപ്പിൽ 5 ഇരട്ടി വർദ്ധനവ്
- Treading the Middle-Path on Temple Management
- Taming the dragon-Part-3
- Taming the dragon- Part 2
- India- China trade wars on the cards? Well researched blog on Indian govt.’s proposed plan to tax 371 Chinese goods
- Before removing the idols, I should be removed; Two Kerala faces we should never forget
- The Unseen Unheard Victims of Article 35(A)
Responses