Why not the Sacred OM on Secular Indian Currency?

published on July 8, 2010

DOES NOT THE SACRED OHM REPRESENT THE HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ETHOS OF OUR COUNTRY?

V.SUNDARAM I.A.S.

The patently anti-Hindu evangelical Catholic Christian Sonia Congress UPA II Government has its own priorities for the aam aadmi of India. Endless and relentless skyrocketing of the prices of essential commodities, complete breakdown of law and order, infiltration of ISI agents from Pakistan, large scale infiltration of more than 30 Million Bangladeshi Muslims into different parts of India (completely organized by Indira Gandhi and her Congress Government through a criminal and treasonable The Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunal ) (IMDT) Act of 1983) posing a definite threat to internal security and our very national survival ARE NOT VITAL NATIONAL ISSUES TO EITHER Sonia Gandhi or Dr.Manmohan Singh.

Likewise planned neglect of defence acquisitions, complete indifference bordering on contempt towards the service conditions and welfare of serving and retired defence personnel belonging to the armed forces causing many of them even to return their gallantry awards to the President, uncontrolled and uncontrollable Maoist violence in many parts of India, overweeningly stinking corruption in public administration with the office of the Prime Minister serving as the omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent beacon-head and with carefully laid underground conduit pipes to No: 10, Janpath, with its VIP occupants having links to unknown and unknowable sources of Christian funds from abroad — THESE AND OTHER PRESSING CRITICAL AND NATIONAL PROBLEMS ARE OF NO CONCERN TO THE IRRESPONSIBLE, SHAMELESS AND DEFIANTLY CORRUPT PETTICOAT GOVERNMENT OF Dr Manmohan Singh.

In short, the banana republic of India has become a global symbol for Himalayan corruption, Himalayan fraud, Himalayan terrorism, Himalayan immorality and Himalayan savagery. The two shining symbols of this national treachery on the one hand and international knavery on the other are the super de facto Prime Minister Sonia Gandhi and the supine de jure Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh. My way of joking is to tell the truth about Dr Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi and her creeping and crawling two-legged insects like Pranab Mukherjees, Antonys, Chidambarams and others of their invertebrate ilk.

The most TROUBLING AND SHOCKING CURRENT AND RECENT NEWS ITEM relates to the recent announcement of the Reserve Bank of India to this effect: The Indian rupee will soon join the elite club of major currencies like the dollar, euro, pound sterling and yen to have a unique identification symbol. The Union Cabinet will soon decide on the matter of approving a symbol reflecting the Hindi alphabet standing for ‘R’.

The murky background (like the Spectrum Fraud of Dalit Union Minister Raja) to this UPA II Currency Revolution is as follows:

In order to Evangelize and Islamize India by using the subterfuge of the non-existent public need for the modernization of the Face of the Indian Rupee, the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance appointed a Committee of seven members with Smt.Usha Thorat, Deputy Governor of RBI Mumbai as Chairman in 2009 to invite public entries containing proposals for the incorporation of New Symbols in the Indian Rupee. This Committee was directed to critically examine all the proposals and then make a suitable recommendation for the final adoption of a suitable design for the Indian Rupee. The composition of the Committee is as follows:

(i) Smt. Usha Thorat, Deputy Governor, RBI, Mumbai-Chairman.

(ii) Shri K.V. Eapen, Joint Secretary, Deptt. of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.

(iii) Ms. T. Kumar, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Culture, New Delhi.

(iv) Smt. Aditi Mehta, Joint Secretary, Indira Gandhi national Center for Arts New Delhi.

(v)Shri Anil Sinha, Chairperson, Integrated Desgin Services and Industry Programmes & Projects, National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad.

(vi) Professor Hemant Nagdive, Director, JJ School of Arts, Mumbai.

(vii) Shri Bazil Shaikh, Chief General Manager, RBI, Mumbai.

Meetings of this Jury were held on 29/30 September, 2009 in Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts, New Delhi and on 16th November, 2009 in Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi for evaluation of entries. Out of more than 25,000 entries received by this Committee, only 3331 were eligible entries. Out of these 3331 entries, only five final entries have been short-listed and selected by this jury.

The criteria adopted by the Jury in short-listing the 5 Symbols was that the Symbol should represent the historical and cultural ethos of the country as widely accepted across the Country and that the Symbol has to be in the Indian National Language script or a visual representation. The second stage of selection focused on finer details such as whether the symbol.

(i) is distinct;
(ii) can evoke a ready recall in India as well as internationally;
(iii) is not unduly cluttered, i.e. simplicity;
(iv) has strength of design;
(v) is easy to write and typecast; and
(vi) has integrity, unity of form and compact look

In response to the Government advertisement announcing public competition and calling for submission of Symbols, thousands of entries were received by the Smt.Thorat Committee. I am presenting below, by way of illustration, 46 symbols which were presented to the Committee and which were rejected outright without assigning any reasons

One of the above Symbols centering round English Alpabet R or Hindi Alphabet , could have been considered by the Committee. The Symbol on the extreme right in the third row above from the top could have been considered for selection. But this symbol does not even remotely suggest the Crescent of Islam or the Cross of Christianity. No wonder it was rejected without much ado. The very first of the 5 Symbols approved by the Committee given below can be seen in the last row above (the Symbol second from the right in the last row above). This was placed first by the Committee only because it represents the symbolic combination of the Crescent of Islam and the Cross of Christianity.

I am presenting below the following 5 Symbols approved and short-listed by the Smt.Usha Thorat Committee. The Committee has claimed that the proposal has been prompted by the growing influence of the Indian economy in the global arena and that thea short-listed five symbols for the Indian rupee drawn up the Committee, reflect the Indian ethos and culture. According to the Committee, like the US Dollar ($) and the Japanese Yen (Â¥), the new Indian Rupee too will soon have a unique sign that will be recognized worldwide.
The 5 short-listed symbols

The symbols above are a mischievously political and lethal combination of the predatory Islamic Crescent and the Christian Cross — global symbols of barbarous violence of the two alien Abrahamic Faiths during the last 1, 500 years. I would like to raise the following questions in this context:

a) From when did the CHRISTIAN AND THE ISLAMIC CRESCENT become the Shining Symbols of Indian ethos and culture?

b) From the days of Islamic marauders like Mir Kasim who invaded Sind in 712 AD?

c) From the days of Mohammed of Ghazni who raped north western India and destroyed the Somnath temple in the 1st quarter of the 11th century between 1009 AD and 1025 AD?

d) From the days of Mohammed Ghori who raided and ransacked north-western India in the last 2 decades of the 12th century?

e) From the days of Portuguese Inquisition of Goa initiated by St.Francis Xavier in 1540 AD?

f) What explains the unrequited ‘carnal’ (of the flesh, nothing but the flesh and fleshy!?) infatuation of Sonia Congress Party for the Islamic and Christian Symbol alone as the Shining Symbols of Indian ethos and culture?

g) Why should the closed Abrahamic mind or mindlessness of Sonia Congress UPA II Government be deliberately oblivious of or mischievously indifferent towards the ancient and shinning symbol OHM (the symbol can be seen at the top of the article) as wholly representative of Indian ethos and culture?

h) If Sonia Gandhi from Ottavio Quattrocchi ‘s Italy or Ottavio Quattrocchi from Sonia Gandhi’s Italy can be viewed as true representatives of Indian ethos and culture, then why not the sacred Hindu Symbol of OHM (the symol can be seen at the top of the article) be treated on the same cultural footing by the Evangelical, Pan-Islamic and anti-Hindu Sonia Congress UPA II Government?

The final answers to these questions have to be provided by the people of India uniting and acting together to throw out the Sonia Congress Party and its Islamic terrorist friends in India and the Middle-east from the soil of India forever.

I am presenting below my analysis of the SYMBOL 1 above on the extreme left to prove my main point that it is a planned political combination of the Islamic Crescent and the Christian Cross. Even a cursory perusal of the Symbol presented below is nothing but a combination of SONIA’S CHRISTIAN CROSS + AHMED PATEL’S CRESCENT!

The Flag of Turkmenistan                                                           Crescent atop a minaret
One source of inspiration for the RBI?!                                  Another source of inspiration ?!

I have presented the Flag of Turkmenistan above to argue that the Crescent on this Flag is similar to the Crescent proposed by the Reserve Bank of India Committee in Symbol 1 on the extreme left presented above which I have already referred to as the Ahmed Patel CRESCENT. Was the Reserve Bank of India inspired or influenced by the Crescent in the Flag of Turkmenistan? (!)

The Italian Tsarina Sonia Gandhi, the Chairman of the UPA Co-ordination Committee (with the self-declared official status of a Union Cabinet Minister and self-demonstrated and established draconian status of a super de facto Prime Minister) in league with Ahmed Patel, the pan-Islamic and virulently anti-Hindu Muslim Rasputin from Gujarat, has drawn up the above symbol as a potent political instrument of minority vote-bank politics. Women like Sonia Maino and men like Ahmed Patel are dubitable nationalists and indubitably treacherous internationalists!! The lethal forces of global Christianity and global Islam have come together with the full political and official support of Sonia Congress UPA II Government to destroy Hinduism and Sanatana Dharma forever on the sacred soil of India.

Drawing their audacious inspiration from the toxic Nehruvian ideology of venomous anti-Hindu pseudo-secularism, Sonia Gandhi and Ahmed Patel have conspired together to imperiously impose their respective monotheistic religious symbols upon the official currency of our sacred motherland. Their virulent hatred towards Hinduism and Sanatana Dharma is well-known. After all did not Sonia Gandhi dub the RSS as a communal rightist organization?

WHY CANNOT THE ANTI-NATIONAL AND ANTI-HINDU SONIA CONGRESS UPA II GOVERNMENT INCORPORATE THE SACRED TIME-HONOURED SYMBOL

UPON THE PROPOSED MOTIF 1 ABOVE ON EXTREME LEFT? Now by superimposing the alien religious symbols upon our currency, the UPA II Goveernment is clearly giving the political message of their total contempt for their unthinking Hindus and Hindu voters of India. They are cleverly communicating to their Muslim and Christian supporters that they are the only genuine natural citizens of India. At the same time the Government is also giving an irrevocable message to the effect that the Hindus (the Hindu majority demography not withstanding) are only the refugees of India! Taking hourly instructions from Sonia Gandhi, the sole political representative of the Pope in India, the openly pro-Islamic and pro-Christian UPA II Government is giving a daily deathly message to the Hindus of India to this effect—the Government of India would leave no stone unturned to marginalise the Hindus and subject them to daily doses of cultural and civilizational humiliations and ignominy. Hindus of India hereafter would count only for purposes of CASTE BASED CENSUS.

If the 5 Approved Symbols(different combinations of the Islamic Crescent and the Christian Cross) for the Indian rupee drawn up the Finance Ministry displayed above, reflect the Indian ethos and culture, then by the same token and for the same reason, the incorporation of the sacred OHM (symbol can be seen at the top of the article)time honoured symbol of has to be accepted without the usually contentious and essentially anti-Hindu Sonia’s secular UPA II Government objection and argument.

I have already explained as to how Symbol 1 out of the 5 Approved Symbols presented above is a cleverly managed political marriage between the Islamic Crescent and the Christian Cross. Likewise Symbol 3 out of the 5 Approved Symbols presented above is also a political marriage of the same contraband shady and immoral Sonia Congress variety. This will be clear from the illustrated explanatory notes below.

DIFFERENT TYPES OF CROSSES

Please see the symbol of Cross—second from left– in the second row above. This Cross has been used in one of the 5 Approved Symbols which I have displayed above. For the sake of simple ease of reference, I am showing below in capsule form the two crosses—the one in one of the 5 Approved Symbols and the other in the second row above (second from left)

                        

One of the 5 Approved Symbols  The Cross Symbol in the second row     above
                                                          (Second from left)

EVER SINCE SONIA CONGRESS GOVERNMENT CAME TO POWER IN MAY 2004, IT HAS BEEN WORKING ROUND THE CLOCK TO CONVERT INDIA INTO A WHOLLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN COUNTRY LIKE ITALY. AFTER THE ISSUE OF TWO RUPEE COINS WITH CHRISTIAN CROSS IN 2005, WE NOW HAVE 5 Re COINS WHICH GLORIFY ONLY CHRISTIAN RELIGION.

The here surreptitiously, there openly, the now contemptuously, defiantly, blatantly, sometimes clandestinely and ever consistently Evangelical anti-Hindu Sonia Congress UPA II Government has given a death blow to the doctrine of SECULARISM enshrined in the Indian Constitution by issuing a 5 Re Coin carrying the image of Saint Alphonsa Muttathupadathu (1910-1946). This has been done with focus on the ensuing elections to the Kerala Legislative Assembly. Please see this Sonia Christian 5 Re coin below. (Please see the image of Saint Alphonsa on the coin on the right below)


Catholic Saint Alphonsa on the ‘Secular’ Indian Rs 5 coin

The cause of Sister Alphonsa began on 2 December 1953 in the Syro-Malabar Catholic Diocese of Palai and she was declared a Servant of God. She was canonized as a saint by Pope Benedict XVI on Sunday, 12 October 2008 AT A CEREMONY AT SAINT PETER’S SQUARE to give moral support and encouragement to the Christians of Kerala who are the foremost in supplying innumerable Europe’s Catholic Monastries and Convents with a steady supply of priests and nuns to keep alive in Europe the commercial empire called the Roman Catholic Church. The process of the artificial human drama (patently non-paganish, non-heathenish and totally Catholic Christian to boot!) of Canonization of Saint Alphonsa Muttathupadathu was inaugurated 25 years earlier on 9 July 1985 when she was declared VENERABLE by Pope John Paul II. The next stage in this drama was the Declaration of her Beatification which was made by Pope John Paul II on 8 February 1986 at Kottayam town in Kerala State.

Saint Alphonsa Muttathupadathu of the Immaculate Conception; (19 August 1910 – 28 July 1946) is a Catholic Saint, the second person of Indian origin to be canonized as a saint by the Roman Catholic Church and the first canonized saint of the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, an Eastern Catholic Church of the Saint Thomas Christian community.

Alphonsamma, as she was locally known, was born in Syro-Malabar Catholic Diocese of Palai. She had a poor, difficult childhood and experienced early loss and suffering. She joined the Franciscan Clarist Congregation, and through them completed schooling and made her permanent vows in 1936. She taught school for years but was plagued by illness. Alphonsamma passed away on 28 July 1946. Only two dozen people attended her funeral. In her 36-year lifespan, she did not do anything big and very few people knew her too. Not many noticed anything special about her. She is not known to have involved in any acts of charity or philanthropy during her lifetime. However, claims of her divine intervention began almost immediately upon her death, and often involved the children in the convent school where she had taught.

She is the first person to be conferred sainthood from the Kerala Church which traces its origins to St Thomas the Apostle, who was believed to have arrived in Kerala in AD 52. She is also the first Indian woman to become a saint of the Catholic Church.

Kottayam is the Rome of India and Palai its Vatican. The Syro-Malabar Catholic Church is a Major Archiepiscopal Church in full communion with the Catholic Church. It is one of the 22 sui iuris Eastern Catholic Churches in the Catholic Church. It is the largest of the Saint Thomas Christian denominations with more than 3.6 million believers. It is also the second largest Eastern Catholic Church in communion with the Bishop of Rome

Pope Benedict XVI made a statement to the effect at the Vatican on September 27, 2006. that St. Thomas who first evangelized Syria and Persia, went only to western India and not to South India. THE IMPORT OF THIS STATEMENT WAS THAT ST. THOMAS NEVER TRAVELLED TO SOUTH INDIA. Knowingly or unknowingly, Pope Benedict XVI had in one stroke challenged the basis of Christianity in India and demolished long-held views of the Church in Palai that St. Thomas landed in Kerala, where he spread the gospel among Hindus. The Pope’s comments rooted in fact sent shock waves among the Syrian Christians of Kerala, who proudly trace their ancestry to upper-caste Namboodiri Brahmins who were evangelised by St. Thomas upon his arrival in 52 AD. The comments went unnoticed until Sathya-Deepam, the official mouthpiece of the Syro-Malabar Church, picked it up. Writing in it, George Nedungat, a member of the Oriental Pontifical Institute of Rome, conveyed the community’s anguish and claimed that previous Popes had recognized St. Thomas’s work in South India.

Having officially declared on September 27, 2006 that St.Thomas never came to Kerala, Pope Benedict XVI somersaulted from this position and canonized St. Alphonsa Muttathupadathu belonging to the Syro-Malabar Church on Sunday, 12 October 2008.

More than 800 millions of Hindus in majority would like to declare to the Sonia Congress UPA Government II today: “Pray do not play with us; pray do not trifle with us; pray do not toy with us; pray do not belittle us with pseudo-secular impunity; pray remember that our time-honoured self respect is made of such hard stuff that it can stand your continued onslaught on us and would never get diminished by your contempt or hatred or indifference. We shall not weaken or tire. We shall not flag or fail. Neither the sudden attacks of our enemies nor the long drawn out exertions of vigilance will wear us down. Unflinching, unswerving, indomitable, inflexible and irrepressible we shall remain, now and for ever and ever! Sooner than later, we shall drive out Sonia Congress inspired anti-Hindu jihadi and evangelical forces from our sacred Motherland, for ever!!”

Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

 characters available

Responses

Latest Articles from Bharath Focus

Did You Know?