A Disgraceful BJP MLA – Who does not know History & biten by ‘SECULARITIS’
MLA demands new Pope be invited for St Francis’ exposition in Goa
PTI
Panaji:Â Â Â A BJP MLA on Tuesday demanded in the Legislative Assembly
that the state government invite new Pope Francis for the decadal
exposition of St Francis Xavier in Goa, scheduled to be held next year.MLA Vishnu Wagh said in the House that the state government should
formally extend an invitation to Pope Francis to attend the festival.
———————————————————————————————————
I was ‘LIVID’ after reading the PTI report.
Does this SECULAR ‘ BJP MLA know about the history of the ‘GOA
INQUISITION’ ? Is he aware of the fact that it was the very same St.
Francis who had written to the Queen of Portugal to impose the
‘INQUISTION’ in Goa.
Yes, the very same INQUISITION that brought about untold suffering on the Goan Hindu community.
Does this ‘SECULAR’ BJP MLA know that one of the decree in the infamous
INQUISITION ‘forbade Hindus from carrying out SHRADHAM for the departed
souls of a Goan Hindu Family ?
With such QUISLINGS around, who needs enemies ?
SHAME ON THE BJP.
SICKENING.
———————————————————————————————————-
Details of the Goa Inquisition
http://www.christianaggression.org/item_display.php?type=articles&id=1111142225
Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.
Latest Articles from Bharath Focus
- Narendra Modi: The Architect of India’s Momentous Transformation
- Republic Day Tableaux & Regional Pride
- Tarun Vijay meets Governor Arif Khan on Adi Sankara birthplace
- SC-ST പോസ്റ്റ് മെട്രിക് സ്കോളർഷിപ്പിൽ 5 ഇരട്ടി വർദ്ധനവ്
- Treading the Middle-Path on Temple Management
- Taming the dragon-Part-3
- Taming the dragon- Part 2
- India- China trade wars on the cards? Well researched blog on Indian govt.’s proposed plan to tax 371 Chinese goods
- Before removing the idols, I should be removed; Two Kerala faces we should never forget
- The Unseen Unheard Victims of Article 35(A)
Responses