Leftist Historians & Media Houses Toppled Amicable Solution for Ram Temple in Ayodhya ; Reveals Archaeologist K K Mohammad

By Courtesy: Janmabhumi published on January 16, 2016

Kozhikode: Eminent archaeologist KK Mohammed has exposed the role of Communist historians and Times of India for having inflated the Ayodhya issue, when there were all chances of settling the matter of Ram Janmabhumi in an amicable way.


In his autobiography ‘Njan Bharatiyan’ which was released today, Mohammed exposes how the Communists, Left historians and a section of media worked hand in glove in sabotaging those peaceful solutions. The book, along with a host of controversial exposes on the various sabotages indulged in by Left historians and Babri Action Council, details how it was evident that a temple existed beneath the structure and how the structure was made into a mosque using pillars, slabs and other structural components of the temple.

KK Mohammed was among members from Delhi School of Archaeology who joined the excavation team of Ayodhya headed by Prof VB Lal. The book highlights how, “during the course of excavation, it was discovered that may of the temple pillars had foundations made of bricks. Also it was very clear that the structure’s walls had temple pillars. There were engravings of full ‘kalash’ carved out of black basalt. All this was discerned after spending over two months in studying the structure.


He points out how Left historians and Babri Masjid Action Committee of JNU succeeded in giving matters a crooked turn. “It was the Left historians and their various writings which are given preference over anything else by media houses including Times of India, who took concrete efforts in making those Muslim policy makers who had ample thoughts of peaceful reconciliation, think otherwise,” says Mohammed.

According to Mohammed, the same Leftist venom was instrumental in pumping life into Babri Masjid Action Committee. “Unfortunately, this (Leftist drama) instilled courage and gave false hopes to Babri Masjid Action Committee. This resulted in a reversal of thought process amongst Muslims who had till then, been pondering wholeheartedly about giving back the mosque and settling the matter amicably. They came to a renewed conclusion that the mosque will not be given- a decision on which they stood rooted to. The fodder for this thought process was given solely by interference of Left historians. And had the matter been settled amicably, the nation would not have been facing many of those numerous issues, which they are, now,” he observes, adding that the nation had to pay a heavy price for the same.

Mohammed also reveals how a team led by Left historian Dr Irfan Habib, chairman of Indian Council of Historical Research conducted a meeting on Babri Masjid Action Committee, in ICHR office. “Even though it was opposed by member secretary MGS Narayan, it had little value in the presence of Irfan Habib,” he cites.
The book further says how the “Archaeological Survey came to the conclusion that remnants of a temple was indeed present under the structure known as Babri mosque, following evidences acquired from the excavation site. This was acknowledged by the Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court,” says the book.


Mohammed’s book reveals how out of the 131 people employed towards unbiased collection of excavations, 51 persons were Muslims who were part of Babri Action Committee, who were represented by archaeological historians like Soorajban, Supriya Varma, Jaya Menon along with a Magistrate of Allahabad High Court.

The foreword has been penned by Dr MGS Narayanan and the book has been compiled by eminent journalist Aneesh Kuttan.

Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available


  1. Usha Singh Reply

    January 16, 2016 at 10:43 pm

    Muslim Invaders always destroyed Temples n built their Masjids over it .


    January 17, 2016 at 10:57 am

    It is a pity that all the chances for an amicable settlement were sabotaged by vested interests,
    At the peak of the Ayodha agitation it was also proposed that the mosque can be moved as it is to an alternatrive site using the foreign technology where a building is shifted as it is by inserting a platform of wheels under the foundation. many national parties were encouraging muslim leaders involved in the agitation not to accept any such proposal, what a pity that at a moment when an amicable settlement could have saved the nation from the unnecessary violence and hatred between the two communities it was not the foreign hand but our own people who were undermining the conciliatory efforts.

    No body can deny that many prominent hindu temples were destroyed under the muslim rule and ayodhya temple is no exception. In fact while studying B.A. history i read a book ‘crescent of india’ by sita ram sharma (published in 1940) in which the author said that his ancesotrors had told him that the columns of the mosque around qutab minar which were plastered at that time had hindu gods and motifs. Nobody could say that with authority at that time but now when you take a round of the qutab near the iron pillar you an clearly see that these pillars whose plaster has now worn off are taken from the hindu temples of Rai Pithora, the chauhan capital.

    The Babri Masjid Action Committee would do a great service to the nation if instead of hardening its ever-changing position, shows magnamity and and relinquishes its claim over the babri masjid.

    The book by archaeologist Mohammed which contains photographs of the excavated pillars strengthens the belief that babri masjid was built on the remnants of the destroyed Ram temple.

    One wonders whether the Muslim or the Sikh community would have shown the same patience and perseverence in following the century-old court case if the site would have been connected even remotedly with prophet mohaammed or any of the ten sikh gurus.

  3. Kapil Deo Tripathi Reply

    January 17, 2016 at 12:41 pm

    there is only zid not the masjid. if any historical evidence matters for fanatics,communists and politics gyanvapi masjid would have been given to vishwanath temple.it is weakness of indian system which includes judiciary also.any sane voice is rarity in this system.I sallute Dr.K K Mohmmad

  4. Y K singh Reply

    January 17, 2016 at 4:29 pm

    Leftist historians & media houses have practically destroyed our country and Still ruining .

  5. B Raja Reply

    January 17, 2016 at 10:48 pm

    Thank you, Sir for speaking out the TRUTH.

  6. Balaji Reply

    January 18, 2016 at 12:33 am

    It’s simple really, the question is who was in ayodya first Ram or Babar? If that does not solve it then nothing will

  7. sandeep tare Reply

    January 18, 2016 at 8:01 am

    this whole world belongs to ram n krishna ,no false evidences r required to topple them , this biggest foolishness of people ghar me ram/krisna ki pooja aur baher virodh ,ye sarvatha galat he,ab maszid nahi bhavya mandir hi chahiye.

  8. A. R Prabhakar Reply

    January 18, 2016 at 11:29 am

    Now we have a government that wants a temple to be built there. If the historical evidence is such that proves the existence of the temple before construction of Babri mosque, then the Allahabad High Court must give their judgment,and resolve the matter once and for all. Let harmony prevail for the efforts to be directed in the right direction for progress of the country and welfare of the people.

  9. Girija Sharma Reply

    January 18, 2016 at 6:29 pm

    Temple will be made in AYODHYA.

  10. Raju Reply

    January 19, 2016 at 3:56 am

    Whether it is congress or communist, or Muslim league, no body found existing for India. They act for their party to get power and money. “Satya meva jayate” not exists. all are crooked , dishonest and selfish. India is not going to reach anywhere if we fail to under stand what and why “sathya meva jayate” inscripted in our flag.
    Muslim kings were barbarians. See, how can we expect good from a king who kills his blood brothers and put his own parents in jail to get power ? India is country where. Bharat, brother of Lord SriRama ruled the country, in his absence by keeping Sri Rama’s shoes on thron and worshipping it.
    Only the party or persons who values
    Indian culture has to be in power. All other insects and parasites has to be removed .

  11. Anil duggal Reply

    January 19, 2016 at 6:34 am

    Thanks Sir.Your observations will help the country in solving biggest problem.

  12. A C Gurunath Reply

    January 19, 2016 at 7:08 am

    Excellent revelation…

  13. Dipankar Mukherjee Reply

    January 19, 2016 at 10:12 am

    This proves that Leftist intervenism pitchforked BMAC (which was hoist on its own petard), into contrived unjustified illgotten prominence

  14. Sanjeet Reply

    January 19, 2016 at 12:13 pm

    Sir do u have any information regarding tejomahal?

  15. M..N.Krishnappa Reply

    January 19, 2016 at 3:44 pm

    Muslims should cooperate in building Ram Mandir at the proposed site.This attitude will go a long way in Hindu Muslim relations.

  16. TRULY Reply

    January 19, 2016 at 5:11 pm

    Truly wonderful. Most of us knew about a temple below Babri Masjid but never knew how anti-hindu thereby anit-naionals twisted the facts to suit their agenda. Hope the truth will be known with all the facts and photos.

  17. gajananmishra Reply

    January 19, 2016 at 7:48 pm

    communalism in india today owes a lot to leftist historiography.

  18. Naveen Kumar Reply

    January 19, 2016 at 10:11 pm

    Fact always remain fact…………the land of Ayodhya belongs to Lord Rama then how this land can be mark for a outsider cruel invader Babar…..every one should come together to build the grand temple of our Lord Rama in Ayodhya.

  19. Rajiv Reply

    January 20, 2016 at 1:07 am

    Fact cannot alter time store all data is strong enough than any living being – there was Ram Temple and that should remain there . Why to the delay decision – need fact track Judgement .

  20. K G Surendran Reply

    January 20, 2016 at 12:16 pm

    Irfan Habib is turning out to be a BAD JOKE, if he did convene a meeting of BMAC in the ICHR despite objections. That Muslim warlords destroyed temples is not a revelation however, left historians would like gullible present day Indians to think otherwise, truth anyway will be out and they will be exposed though from trends taking centre stage in the country today, it seems their penchant for mischief and fashion false public discourse has not abated they continue to confuse to discredit mainstream thought so that the Congress can come back to power.

  21. arvind Reply

    May 20, 2016 at 9:22 pm

    If bjp wins 2021 must.

  22. DR P H VAIDYA Reply

    April 21, 2018 at 5:52 pm

    Congrats to those who have shown courage to place facts before the public


    November 18, 2018 at 8:33 am

    After reading once again after about twenty years Vedas&Upanishads I know now that it’s only life experience makes one understand in its full essence the in- depth meaning of such priceless marvels of knowledge..yes! Now I know for sure Bible first and thereafter Khura..an are results of reading and assimilating these treasures of humanity by the concerned individuals…nowhere the term ” Hindu” appears in these writings…but let us approve them as our own prides….I would be privileged to be associated with this team for ever…HARINARAYANAN..

Latest Articles from Dharma Smriti

Did You Know?