There is no need for a caste-based census: VHP
The Vishwa Hindu Parishad has opposed caste-based census, saying it would lead to caste-based discrimination and strengthen casteist forces.
“There should not be caste based discrimination. There was no caste-based census after 1931, why should the government revive it now?” VHP leader Pravin Togadia asked on Friday.
Talking to the media in Madurai , he also opposed any move to provide reservation for Muslims and Christians saying it was unconstitutional.
The Constitution did not provide for religion-based quota and the VHP would mobilise students, unemployed youths and caste associations for launching a countrywide movement against any attempt to provide reservation to minorities, he said.
Pointing out that 50 percent reservation had been made for scheduled castes, scheduled tribes, and other backward classes, he wondered from where the government would provide further reservation.
The VHP will not allow the existing reservation to be ‘snatched’ for providing quota to minorities.
“We have charted out an action plan to counter the government move,” he said.
On demands for reservation for Christian Dalits, he said, “Let Christians admit openly to the international community that caste system and discrimination existed.”
Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.
Latest Articles from Bharath Focus
- Narendra Modi: The Architect of India’s Momentous Transformation
- Republic Day Tableaux & Regional Pride
- Tarun Vijay meets Governor Arif Khan on Adi Sankara birthplace
- SC-ST പോസ്റ്റ് മെട്രിക് സ്കോളർഷിപ്പിൽ 5 ഇരട്ടി വർദ്ധനവ്
- Treading the Middle-Path on Temple Management
- Taming the dragon-Part-3
- Taming the dragon- Part 2
- India- China trade wars on the cards? Well researched blog on Indian govt.’s proposed plan to tax 371 Chinese goods
- Before removing the idols, I should be removed; Two Kerala faces we should never forget
- The Unseen Unheard Victims of Article 35(A)
Responses