For a change, Irrespective of Political affiliations Hindus unite to rebuff Jihadi arrogance in Chennai
United Hindu power successfully rebuffs Muslim goondaism in Tambaram,
Chennai.
A common roadside clash went on at Tambaram, Chennai. A bike rider dashed a shop boy. When the shop boy questioned the rider for such driving, there started a quarrel. The shop boy went to his shop and the bike rider followed him. The Shop owner also questioned the rider and supported his shop boy. The quarrel soon became an attack by Muslim goondas led by 20 TMMK men including the bike rider.  They attacked the shop and the shop keeper.
The bike rider was a Muslim and a member of TMMK (Tamilnadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam). The Shop owner is a Hindu. The news spread throughout the town immediately. All the Hindu businessmen united and called for a Bandh on 10-8-2010 against such aghast behavior of the Muslims against Hindus. Bandh was organized by the local Congress MLA Bhagawandass Reddiar. It was a total Bandh supported by all party members including DMK. Congress passed a resolution giving effect to the Bandh, and demanding TMMK Office which is situated in the Municipal area, a clear case of encroachment, to be removed. Police informed that they have arrested 11 TMMK persons.
Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.
Latest Articles from Bharath Focus
- Narendra Modi: The Architect of India’s Momentous Transformation
- Republic Day Tableaux & Regional Pride
- Tarun Vijay meets Governor Arif Khan on Adi Sankara birthplace
- SC-ST പോസ്റ്റ് മെട്രിക് സ്കോളർഷിപ്പിൽ 5 ഇരട്ടി വർദ്ധനവ്
- Treading the Middle-Path on Temple Management
- Taming the dragon-Part-3
- Taming the dragon- Part 2
- India- China trade wars on the cards? Well researched blog on Indian govt.’s proposed plan to tax 371 Chinese goods
- Before removing the idols, I should be removed; Two Kerala faces we should never forget
- The Unseen Unheard Victims of Article 35(A)
Responses