Firangi Memahib – India’s Intractiable cancer, within and without

Kuppahalli Sitaramayya Sudarshan, former RSS Sarsanghachalak has recently come out with a statement on 10th November 2010 blasting Sonia Gandhi for her patently criminal actions which included murders and assassinations. Following are the main points made by him.

SUDARSHAN’S POINTS

1. K.S Sudarshan has called Sonia Gandhi a CIA agent and accused her of plotting assassinations of her husband and former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and his mother Indira Gandhi.

2. K.S Sudarshan also charged Sonia for delaying medical aid to Indira Gandhi. “Instead of taking her to Ram Manohar Lohia hospital she took her to a medical institute. Why was Rajiv Gandhi’s Z plus security was withdrawn when he was on election campaign,” former RSS chief asked.

3. K.S Sudarshan has also described Sonia as an illegitimate offspring because she was born in 1946 when her father was in jail. Yet she writes, she was born in 1948 completely overlooking the fact that she was born in 1946.

Sudarshan’s counterattack was made legitimately, fairly, and justly, as a political rejoinder to the totally baseless, juvenile, irresponsible, reprehensible, ignorant and foolish observations of the anointed ‘Crown Prince’ Rahul Gandhi who on 6th October, 2010 said in Bhopal: “I know only that both SIMI and the RSS are fanatical and hold fundamentalist views.” When it was pointed out to Rahul Gandhi that the SIMI is a proscribed Islamic terror outfit while RSS is not so, that ignoramus paper giant, steeped in petrified ‘feudal’ adolescence, declared that he did not care about the difference between SIMI a proscribed Islamic terror outfit and the RSS a legitimate social organization claiming fidelity and fealty of over 200 million patriotic Indian citizens!!!

Some time ago the BBC, in an important programme, announced that the RSS is the largest non-governmental organization in the world. If this fact is taken into the notice of the perpetually adolescent, ‘Crown Prince’, I can well imagine what would be his reaction to this piece of information. Perhaps with beaming and boisterous confidence he would exclaim: “The BBC is one of the Saffron terror outfits of the RSS and BJP! We will send our most heroic Home Minister who is fighting Saffron terrorism in India today to England to meet the British Prime Minister and see that the BBC gets suitably reprimanded for their unacceptable offences against the forces of secularism not only in India but through out the world.”  If there is a chance of missing a point in any political debate, you can most definitely be sure that this most extraordinary 40 year old Sonia Congress ‘Youth Icon’ will not be the man to miss it!!!
Moreover, the ‘Crown Prince’ Rahul Gandhi also does not know and does not care to know that it was his great-grand father and India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru who invited the RSS to participate in the 1963 Republic Day parade in recognition of the patriotic services rendered by the RSS during the 1962 China War!!!

New York Times carried a full-page Advertisement placed by an organization called the Forum for Saving Gandhi’s Heritage in the New York Times of October 6, 2007 about the multifaceted glory and grandeur relating to the Himalayan corruption and Himalayan crimes of Sonia Gandhi and her family, including her son the ‘Crown Prince’ Rahul who was detained by the FBI in Boston in 2001 for carrying a large sum of unaccounted cash to the tune of 200,000 U.S Dollars !!.

This full-page advertisement highlighted Sonia Gandhi’s,
Intolerance,
Deception,
Self-aggrandisement,
Violence,
Corruption and Fraud.

Sonia Gandhi thought that she could silence her Hindu critics in America, notably Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani, by frightening them into submission through a legal notice, followed by legal action and punitive damages. She got the Indian National Overseas Congress to file two libel cases in a New York Court against Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani and the organisation of NRI Hindus in USA, they represented. When the two cases finally came up for hearing, Sonia Gandhi shamelessly absconded from the court. The American Court asked these three questions

1. How is the Indian National Overseas Congress an aggrieved party?
2. Where is Sonia Gandhi, the complainant in this case?
3. Why is she absenting herself from this Court?
When no answers were forthcoming from the Indian National Overseas Congress in USA, Sonia Gandhi and Sonia Congress in India, and when the Court found that the undeclared intention of Sonia Gandhi was to avoid the Court at any cost, the American Court rejected the libel cases of Sonia Gandhi.

I have carefully gone through the detailed legal analysis done by Kornstein Veisz Wexler & Pollard, LP, New York, the Law Firm that represented Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani in their defence case against Sonia Gandhi. The counter affidavit filed by this Law Firm against Sonia Gandhi was a masterpiece which put Sonia Gandhi to a sullen silence and everlasting shame! The Court thoroughly understood that Sonia Gandhi was not interested in substantive justice. She was just using the Indian National Overseas Congress in America to settle political scores with Hindu activists like Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani. I would like to quote one of the most telling paragraphs from this counter-affidavit prepared by Kornstein Veisz Wexler & Pollard, LP, New York:

“It becomes clear that all of the statements complained of by the Indian National Overseas Congress are non-actionable. This politically motivated libel action by INOC Inc. should be barred at the threshold. THE STATEMENTS AT ISSUE ARE NOT `OF AND CONCERNING’ THE PLAINTIFF. As a matter of constitutional law, they were not made with `actual malice’. They are, moreover, either true, free of defamatory meaning, protected opinion or permissible hyperbole. Dismissal, now, at the start of this litigation, is amply justified and absolutely necessary, lest a bad precedent breed more such misguided libel cases. Early dismissal becomes even more essential when one considers the political context of this case. At bottom, this is a case about a U.S. subsidiary of a powerful political party in a large foreign country attempting to use our Courts to silence and intimidate its American critics in America. This is not only unacceptable; it is intolerable. WE AS A PEOPLE HAVE COMPLETELY REJECTED THE NOTION THAT A POLITICAL PARTY CAN `USE THE COURTS TO DESTROY POLITICAL OPPONENTS’. [United States v. Helstoski, 442 U.S. 477, 493 (1979)]’.”

The politically shameless and supremely corrupt Sonia Gandhi and her wholly owned family business, called the Indian National Congress, found to their dismay that the Courts of Law in America cannot be intimidated, blackmailed or purchased like the Courts of Law in India. In India Sonia Gandhi and her clan always believed in using the corrupt and pliable Courts of Law to silence or destroy their political opponents!!!

The Congress Party in India after our Independence, right from the days of Nehru till today, has always believed in using the Police, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to silence or to blackmail or to intimidate their political critics and opponents. Nehru used the same method unsuccessfully against GURUJI GOLWALKER, the second Sarsanghchalak of the RSS. Going along the same path, Indira Gandhi failed miserably against Jai Prakash Narain. Sonia Gandhi and her political goons in India seemed to be under the delusion that they can influence the working of American Courts of Law in the same way in which they are able to manipulate all our Courts of Law, including the Supreme Court of India. In this nefarious attempt they failed miserably.
The intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the Congress Party under the politically shameful leadership of politically shameless Sonia Gandhi has indeed today touched a nadir. How could the Congress Party have been successful in deceiving the general public in India for so long with its bogus secularism, Islamic appeasement and corruption? The answer to this question can be given in the words of Dr. Babu Suseelan: “The Congress Party has failed miserably in defending our borders, Hindus, Hindu culture, or to do anything more than protecting their own narrow political interests. As a party, the Congress has reduced its mind and heart to the level of intellectual and moral bankruptcy, outright dishonesty, corruption, ineptitude, nepotism, and inefficiency. These immoral practices have become the fallback mode of the Congress leaders. In the name of pseudo secularism, Congress moral relativists, atheists, and agnostics want to appease Muslims and want to overturn traditional Hindu culture and moral values. Now the Congress Party headed by the Italian Catholic Sonia is devising new cunning schemes to restrict our liberties. For several years, Hindu organizations around the world had exposed Congress leaders’ despicable behaviour and corrupt practices. It is about time Indians realize SONIA GANDHI IS A `PLANT’ IN INDIA BY EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN POLITICS whose aim is to expand Christianity in India. From Hindu religious beliefs Christianity is not a religion in the true sense but a disguised politics of power. These people will kill, murder and annihilate any existing community to further their fanatical goals”.
Now to come back to Sudarshan’s attack on Sonia Gandhi. Following Sudarshan’s tirade against Sonia Gandhi, there was a war of words between the Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party with the former demanding that the BJP and RSS should condemn the statement if they do not concur with it. BJP distanced itself from Sudarshan’s comments and even appeared critical of it.

Soon after Sudarshan spoke against Sonia Gandhi, Dr Subramanian Swamy came out with a Statement stating that he fully endorses the views expressed by Sudarshan. I have no doubt that Sudarshan made his observations after taking due note of all the facts / statements that are to be found in the website of Dr Subramanian Swamy (http://www.janataparty.org/soniaisthemodern.html) under the title ‘KNOW YOUR SONIA’. THE MURDEROUS CRIMES OF SONIA GANDHI REFERRED TO BY SUDARSHAN HAVE BEEN EXPLAINED IN GREAT DETAIL IN THE WEBSITE OF DR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY.

I understand that two cases have been registered by the police in Rajasthan against Sudarshan for his observations against Sonia Gandhi referred to above. Upon oral directions of Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, the Union Home Ministry, the Congress Bureau of Intimidation (CBI) and the  Enforcement Directorate (ED) are capable of registering cases against the Secretary General of the United Nations, the Prime Minister of China, the British Queen Elizabeth II and what not, with abiding faith, understanding supplication and reverential submission to the Nehru-Gandhi clan, in all the Congress ruled states. I would like to enlighten the Police trapped in Sonia Congress chains by inviting their attention to the FOLLOWING FACTS AGAINST SONIA GANDHI HIGHLIGHTED IN THE WEBSITE OF DR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY and which have been noticed by thousands of viewers all over the world during the LAST SEVERAL YEARS.

I have presented all the relevant and pertinent points relating to the wonderful and exceptionable antecedents of Sonia Gandhi and her family from Dr Subramanian Swamy’s article titled ‘SONIA GANDHI IS THE MODERN ROBERT CLIVE’.

(http://www.janataparty.org/soniaisthemodern.html)

1. The bottom line observed in Sonia’s mindset is that Sonia Gandhi can disregard Indian laws with impunity. If cornered or if she becomes vulnerable to prosecution, she can always run back to Italy. In Peru, President Fujimori who all along claimed to be “born Peruvian”, when faced with a corruption charge fled to Japan with his loot and reclaimed his Japanese citizenship. That is Sonia’s bottom line fall-back option too. … Is it not significant that the political career graph of Sonia Gandhi advances concomitantly with a series of assassinations and apparently accidental deaths?

2. How did Sanjay’s plane on June 23, 1980 nosedive to a crash and yet the plane fuselage failed to explode upon impact? There was no fuel! How was that possible since flight register shows full tank before take-off? Why was there no inquiry conducted?

3. Is it not a fact that Indira Gandhi died because of loss of blood from the wounds and not directly due to a bullet impacting her head or heart ? Then is it not strange that Sonia had insisted that the bleeding Indira be driven to Lohia Hospital– in the opposite direction to AIIMS which had a contingency protocol set up for precisely such an event ? And after reaching Lohia Hospital, did not Sonia change her mind and demand that they all drive to AIIMS thus losing 24 valuable minutes?

4. The same kind of mystery surrounds the sudden deaths of Sonia’s other political roadblocks such as Rajesh Pilot, Jitendra Prasad, and Madhavrao Scindia. Such untimely deaths happened in the dark ages in Italy. Should we allow it to happen in India like dumb cattle going to slaughter?

5. ASSASSINATION OF HER HUSBAND RAJIV.

In 1977, when the Janata Party defeated the Congress at the polls, and formed the government, it widely known and published that Sonia with her two children abandoned Indira Gandhi, and ran to the Italian Embassy in New Delhi and hid there. Rajiv Gandhi was a government servant then[as an Indian Airlines pilot], but he too tagged along and hid in that foreign embassy! Such was her baneful influence on him. Rajiv did snap out Sonia’s influence after 1989, but alas he was assassinated before he could rectify the situation.

Those close to Rajiv knew that he was planning to set things right about Sonia after the 1991 elections. He held her to blame for all the financial scandals that led to his defeat at the 1989 polls. She knew of it too because he had told her on his trip to Soviet Union in February 1991. Ever wonder why Sonia’s closest advisers are those whom Rajiv literally hated? Ambika Soni is one such name. Ever wonder why she has asked the President of India to set aside on a mercy petition the Supreme Court judgment directing that Rajiv Gandhi’s LTTE killers be hanged, when she was not similiarly moved for Satwant Singh who killed Indira Gandhi or even recently for Dhanajoy Chattopadhyaya? The explanation for this special consideration for the LTTE perhaps lies in what Rajiv had told her about their future. May be therefore Sonia feels obliged to the LTTE for the assassination.

… BUT THE MOST SINISTER ASPECT OF SONIA GANDHI’S LINKS IS HER CONNECTION WITH TERRORISTS. …

Besides the Palestinian extremists, the Maino family have had extensive business dealings with Saddam Hussein [see Annexure-18], and surprisingly since 1984 with the LTTE [“the Tamil Tigers”]. Sonia’s mother Paola Predebon Maino, and businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi are the main contacts with the Tigers. The mother used the LTTE for money laundering and Quattrocchi for selling weapons to earn commissions. Sonia’s conduit to the LTTE has been and is through Arjun Singh who uses Bangalore as the nodal point for contact.

There is a string of circumstantial evidence pointing to the prima facie possibility that the Maino family may have contracted with the LTTE to kill Rajiv Gandhi. The family may have assured the LTTE that nothing would happen to them because they would ensure it is blamed on the Sikhs or the evidence so much fudged that no court would convict them[ the LTTE intercepted transcripts show this expectation of the LTTE]. But D.R. Karthikeyan of the CBI who led the SIT investigation got the support of Narasimha Rao, cracked the case, and succeeded in getting the LTTE convicted in the trial court, which conviction was upheld by the Supreme Court in 1999.

Although on the involvement of some members of the Congress
Party in the assassination, D.R. Karthikeyan soft peddled it ignoring a number of leads perhaps because he did not want political controversy to put road blocks on his investigation as a whole.

The Justice J. S. Verma Commission, which was set up as the last official act of the Chandrashekhar government before demitting office on June 21, 1991, did find that the Congress leaders had disrupted the security arrangements for the Sriperumbudur meeting where Rajiv Gandhi was finally assassinated. The Commission wanted further probe into it but the Rao government rejected that demand. In the meantime under Sonia’s pressure, the Jain Commission was set up by the Rao government, which tried to muddy the waters and thus exonerate the LTTE. But the trial court judgment convicting the LTTE came earlier than the Commission could conclude, and that sinister effort therefore too failed.

Nowadays, Sonia is quite unabashed in having political alliance with those who like MDMK, PMK, and DMK praise Rajiv Gandhi’s killers. NO INDIAN WIDOW WOULD EVER DO THAT. SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES ARE MANY, AND RAISE A DOUBT. My investigations into Sonia’s involvement in Rajiv’s assassination is therefore necessary. I am also author of a best seller titled ‘Assassination Of Rajiv Gandhi—Unasked Questions and Unanswered Queries’ [published by Konark in 2000] IN WHICH I HAVE GIVEN SOME INDICATIONS OF THIS POSSIBLE CONSPIRACY.

CONCLUSION:

No action can lie against Sudarshan for having repeated the points made over a decade ago by Dr Subramanian Swamy and published on his well-known political party website janataparty.org. It is been seen every day by thousands of viewers all over the world. If repeating the words of Dr Subramanian Swamy can be viewed as an offence by the Sonia Congress Police then I have no doubt that they would also treat the simple act of viewing of Dr Subramanian Swamy’s website by thousands of innocent viewers as an equal offence, if not more.

I dare the Sonia Congress police in any part of India to file a defamation suit against the Janata Party President Dr Subramanian Swamy for having published certain well-known truths about Sonia Gandhi and her family on his Party Website.

I am the ALL INDIA GENERAL SECRETARY(IDEOLOGY) OF THE JANATHA PARTY OF DR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY. I fully endorse the views of Dr Subramanian Swamy on Sonia Gandhi and her family, which were only reiterated by K. S Sudarshan on the stage in Bhopal on November 10, 2010.

I assert my Fundamental Right not only to FREEDOM OF SPEECH but more importantly FREEDOM AFTER SPEECH, as a proud Indian with more than 500 centuries of family background in India dating back to the Age of the Vedas and the Upanishads.
2G Spectrum Scam of Raja is not the end; not even the beginning of the end, but only the end of the beginning for Sonia.

Finally, I warn the alien imposter, pretender, usurper Sonia Gandhi that her time of uncontrolled misrule and unprecedented and unchecked colonial loot in India is coming to an ignominious end in the very near future.