Gujarat Govt to oppose Bill on communal violence
The BJP Government in Gujarat would oppose the Centre’s proposed Bill on controlling communal violence as it violates the Constitution’s basic tenets of equality before law.
Displaying the party’s views on the proposed Bill on communal violence, the BJP’s resolution on it was moved by Chief Minister Narendra Modi at the recently held National Executive meeting in Lucknow.
The proposed draft Bill, intended to curb incidents of communal violence in the country, is required to be ratified by the State legislatures after it is passed by Parliament.
“Gujarat Government would oppose the Bill as it violates the Constitutional principle of equalityâ€, State Parliamentary Affairs Minister Dileep Sanghani told The Pioneer on Monday.
The proposals in the draft Bill are not in the interest of the nation as they aim to protect a particular community in the event of communal riots, Sanghani explained why the Gujarat Government would oppose it.
The draft proposals are politically motivated, he alleged, and added that the Congress-led UPA Government would not be able to pass the Bill in Parliament.
The Bill goes against the Constitution and the even British never thought of bringing such unequal laws, Sanghani told this correspondent.
Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.
Latest Articles from Bharath Focus
- Narendra Modi: The Architect of India’s Momentous Transformation
- Republic Day Tableaux & Regional Pride
- Tarun Vijay meets Governor Arif Khan on Adi Sankara birthplace
- SC-ST പോസ്റ്റ് മെട്രിക് സ്കോളർഷിപ്പിൽ 5 ഇരട്ടി വർദ്ധനവ്
- Treading the Middle-Path on Temple Management
- Taming the dragon-Part-3
- Taming the dragon- Part 2
- India- China trade wars on the cards? Well researched blog on Indian govt.’s proposed plan to tax 371 Chinese goods
- Before removing the idols, I should be removed; Two Kerala faces we should never forget
- The Unseen Unheard Victims of Article 35(A)
Responses