Now Congress Govt promises hike on Imams’ salary
Govt promises action on SC judgment on Imams’ salary
PTI Report
NEW DELHI: Government today said it would take appropriate action to implement Supreme Court’s observations regarding payment of salaries to Imams (clerics) of government-aided mosques.
Leader of the House Pranab Mukherjee gave the assurance to the Lok Sabha on a Zero Hour mention made by RJD chief Lalu Prasad.
Prasad wanted to know the reasons for the delay in implementation of a 1993 Supreme Court judgement on a petition of the All India Imams Organisation relating to salaries of Imams in government-aided mosques and remuneration to clerics in non-aided places of worship.
There was minor uproar in the House after Minority Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid spoke of differences among Imams on drawing salaries from the government.
Prasad said it was the All India Imams Organisation which had approached the Supreme Court in the matter.
BJP members, including Yogi Adityanath and Bijoya Chakraborty, were seen demanding similar remuneration for eight lakh temple priests across the country.
At this point, Mukherjee said government would take note of the Supreme Court judgement.
He said government was fully aware of the situation and will take appropriate action in the matter.
Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.
Latest Articles from Bharath Focus
- Narendra Modi: The Architect of India’s Momentous Transformation
- Republic Day Tableaux & Regional Pride
- Tarun Vijay meets Governor Arif Khan on Adi Sankara birthplace
- SC-ST പോസ്റ്റ് മെട്രിക് സ്കോളർഷിപ്പിൽ 5 ഇരട്ടി വർദ്ധനവ്
- Treading the Middle-Path on Temple Management
- Taming the dragon-Part-3
- Taming the dragon- Part 2
- India- China trade wars on the cards? Well researched blog on Indian govt.’s proposed plan to tax 371 Chinese goods
- Before removing the idols, I should be removed; Two Kerala faces we should never forget
- The Unseen Unheard Victims of Article 35(A)
Responses