Babri Masjid case: Set ‘Ram Lalla’ free, says oldest litigant Hashim Ansari
Lucknow: The oldest litigant in Babri Masjid case, Mohammad Hashim Ansari, has declared that he doesn’t want to pursue the matter any further and wants ‘Ram Lalla’ (infant Ram) to be free. Expressing unhappiness over the politicizing of the Babri case, Ansari, who has been fighting the case since 1959, said he will not attend any protest meeting on Dec 6 to mark the anniversary of Babri Masjid demolition.
Speaking to the mediapersons, Ansari said that the people who are reaping political benefits are staying in bungalows whereas ‘Ram Lalla’ is living in a tent.
“I want to see ‘Ram Lalla’ free,†Ansari asserted. Criticising Uttar Pradesh Minister Azam Khan for calling Ram Janambhoomi “a dead issue”, Ansari took a dig at him and said that from now on Khan will pursue the case and not him. He also accused Khan of playing politics over the Babri issue.Â
Last month Khan had said the Ayodhya issue was “almost dead” as a “temple already exists there” and alleged that the BJP wanted to keep it alive to vitiate the atmosphere.
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Siddharth Nath Singh welcomed Ansari’s decision saying that it’s time that talks should be held and a bigger Ram Mandir should be constructed on the site.
Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.
Latest Articles from Bharath Focus
- Narendra Modi: The Architect of India’s Momentous Transformation
- Republic Day Tableaux & Regional Pride
- Tarun Vijay meets Governor Arif Khan on Adi Sankara birthplace
- SC-ST പോസ്റ്റ് മെട്രിക് സ്കോളർഷിപ്പിൽ 5 ഇരട്ടി വർദ്ധനവ്
- Treading the Middle-Path on Temple Management
- Taming the dragon-Part-3
- Taming the dragon- Part 2
- India- China trade wars on the cards? Well researched blog on Indian govt.’s proposed plan to tax 371 Chinese goods
- Before removing the idols, I should be removed; Two Kerala faces we should never forget
- The Unseen Unheard Victims of Article 35(A)
Responses