Navjot Sidhu calls reservation policy a failure
NEW DELHI: With his party walking a tightrope on the volatile quota issue, BJP MP Navjot Singh Sidhu branded the country’s reservation policy a failure insisting it rarely benefited the disadvantaged sections.
Sidhu, who had joined the medicos in protesting Centre’s proposals to reserve seats for OBC candidates in higher educational establishments, maintained that there should be no compromise with merit.
“I am not against reservation but the problem lies with the policy. And I also believe merit should be protected at all costs,” he told after the BJP’s national executive meeting here.
Nevertheless, he opposed seat quotas for the rich among the reserved categories.
“Why should an income tax payee be eligible for reservation benefits? In my view, the country needs to review its overall reservation policy, which has been a failure as it has not benefited the downtrodden,” Sidhu said.
The Amritsar MP emphasised that the issue should be dealt with as a subject of serious debate.
“Good intentions die if they are not executed,” the cricket commentator, popular for his witty “Sidhuisms”, remarked.
Sidhu was reportedly asked by the party to exercise restraint on the quota issue after he joined medical students protesting the quota proposals.
Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.
Latest Articles from Bharath Focus
- Narendra Modi: The Architect of India’s Momentous Transformation
- Republic Day Tableaux & Regional Pride
- Tarun Vijay meets Governor Arif Khan on Adi Sankara birthplace
- SC-ST പോസ്റ്റ് മെട്രിക് സ്കോളർഷിപ്പിൽ 5 ഇരട്ടി വർദ്ധനവ്
- Treading the Middle-Path on Temple Management
- Taming the dragon-Part-3
- Taming the dragon- Part 2
- India- China trade wars on the cards? Well researched blog on Indian govt.’s proposed plan to tax 371 Chinese goods
- Before removing the idols, I should be removed; Two Kerala faces we should never forget
- The Unseen Unheard Victims of Article 35(A)