Why all this fuss about Ayodhya?

This is NOT a comprehensive article on Ayodhya issue.This is to point out to the public the greatest untruth being propagated to you.

This article is to publicise the truth that:

*What was demolished in Ayodhya is an old temple to build a new one!

*Nobody,including the World Hindu Council-VHP has complained against the temple being demolished (!)and hence, why should this Govt. take action against our leaders –Sri L K Advani,Dr Murli Manohar Joshi and His Excellency Sri Atal Bihari Vajpayee who might have mobilised support for demolishing the structure(see,I wasn’t there to say if they did or not?  )

 

People who are new to this issue,please go to-http://www.ayodhya.com.

 

I do not wish to explain all what this is about as I know most of the readers will be cognizant of what the background is? But is you view subverted by the sick pseudo-secular media & unworthy yet power-hungry politicians who have exploited the introduction of Adult-franchise into an economically and educationally backward society for making easy money back in 1947.

I wish to add here,the relevant excerpts from the conversation I had with a group of young students who showed interest in my words about a related issue.(Distortion of History)

What happened in Ayodhya on the 6th of December,1992 exactly?

Ans: Well,first of all it wasn’t a great secret terrorist move to demolish the structure at Ayodhya to stress it the way it being done.Kar-sevaks were informed and organised to assemble at Ayodhya to raze down the old structure and built the proposed temple dedicated to Lord Rama.

Why should a temple be built by demolishing a place of worship of another community-The Babri Masjid while the Hindus believe –All religions as true?

Ans:See,what was demolished is a temple,an old one to pave way for a better building as planned.

Ancient History

I’ll be surprised if even a single Indian says he hasn’t heard the name of Lord Rama.Lord Rama was born in Ayodhya and the rest of the story is familiar to everybody including nursery children irrespective of their religion.

History books,Govt. docs & excavations and photos of the structure that was demolished have proved the existence of a Temple.

Please research yourself(keep away from the newspapers and newly written History books and ofcourse,the News media) on the Internet  or on reliable History books to find out all about it

(Eg.www.ayodhya.com,

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23038670

http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/books/finale/index.html

http://www.bharatvani.org/books/ayodhya/index.html

http://www.flex.com/~jai/articles/ayodhya.html

etc.)

Story after the dispute in the 1930’s:

It wasn’t a Mosque,as no Mussalman even strayed that way.The term Babri Masjid also came up only recently after the hype.

*The Faisabad Civil Court pointed this out on 3rd March 1951 that No Muslims conducted any prayers there since 1937.

      * The domes of this disputed building were built by the British in 1934.

*The priest at the Ram Temple(the disputed structure aka the Babri Masjid(!)) is appointed and paid by the Government.

*The Rama Idol consecrated below the central dome of the disputed structure is worshipped very day along with recitation of Hare Rama mantra uninterruptedly since 1949.Do you call such a place a mosque?

How did it suddenly became a Mosque in 1992?

Responses