Cases against Kerala women devotees withdrawn
The cases registered by the Kerala Police against 11,000 women devotees for cooking Pongala (rice-jaggery pudding) on roadsides in Thiruvananthapuram on March 7 for offering to the Goddess of Attukal Bhagavathy temple, renowned and revered as Women’s Sabarimala, were withdrawn on Tuesday following widespread protests.
The First Class Magistrate Court in Thiruvananthapuram on Tuesday approved the reports the police submitted for quashing the cases. The Director General of Police had on Monday suspended Deputy Commissioner of Police VC Mohanan for ordering registration of cases against the devotees in two police stations.
However, the Government and the Police Headquarters have not yet ordered any probe into the situation that had led to the registration of cases against the devotees for performing the ritual, an integral part of the annual festival of the Attukal temple. Devotees’ outfits alleged that the Government was trying to bury the issue by taking nominal action against a single official.
The Thampanoor and Fort police stations in Thiruvananthapuram had registered FIRs against 10,000 and 1,000 women devotees respectively for cooking Pongala on the roadsides by blocking movement of vehicles and pedestrians as per Sections 188 and 283 of the IPC in accordance with a High Court order that banned public programmes on roads and roadsides.
The cases were for disobeying an order of a lawfully empowered public servant (the HC) and for causing obstruction in public way. However, the police action was in total violation of the assurance the Chief Minister had personally given in the State Assembly on March 5 that the court order was not applicable in the case of Pongala cooking for the Attukal festival.
After the police action sparked off intense protests which included marches to police stations and State secretariats on Monday, the Chief Minister instructed the DGP to take necessary steps to correct the mistake, freeze the cases and take action against the officials responsible. DCP Mohanan was suspended from service as per this instruction.
The police in their final reports submitted in the court on Tuesday said that the Pongala cooking was a traditional ritual being performed every annual festival of the temple and that this had not caused any difficulties for the public as the festival day had been declared a holiday locally.
The reports also said that it had been decided not to take follow-up action against the devotees on the basis of the FIRs. On the basis of this explanation, the court granted the police’s request to invalidate the cases registered against the devotees. The Chief Minister and DGP had on Monday itself assured that there would be no action on the basis of the FIRs.
A minimum of 25 lakh women had cooked Pongala for offering to the Goddess in connection with the festival on different parts of the capital city on March 7. The temple had got into the Guinness Book of World Records for the largest convergence of women at one place at the same time in 1997.
Meanwhile, Marxist MLA V Sivankutty on Tuesday served a breach of privilege notice against Chief Minister Chandy in connection with the registration of cases against the devotees. The notice was served on the Chief Minister for not fulfilling the assurance given in the Assembly
Welcome to Haindava Keralam! Register for Free or Login as a privileged HK member to enjoy auto-approval of your comments and to receive periodic updates.
Latest Articles from Kerala Focus
- തിരുവാഭരണ പാതയിൽ സ്ഫോടക വസ്തുക്കൾ കണ്ടെത്തിയത് അന്വേഷിക്കണം: കെ.സുരേന്ദ്രൻ
- A Day with Hrudaya & Bhagya, Daughters of Veerbalidani Renjith
- സഞ്ജിതിന്റെ ഭാര്യയുടെ ജീവന് ഭീഷണിയുണ്ട്: പോലീസ് സംരക്ഷണം നൽകണം: കുമ്മനം രാജശേഖരൻ
- Kerala’s Saga of Tackling Political Violence
- Tribute to Nandu Mahadeva ; Powerhouse of Positivity
- പാലക്കാടിന്റെ സ്വന്തം മെട്രോമാൻ
- കേന്ദ്രഏജൻസികളുടെ അന്വേഷണം സംസ്ഥാന സർക്കാർ തടസപ്പെടുത്താൻ ശ്രമിക്കുന്നു: കെ.സുരേന്ദ്രൻ
- Kerala nun exposes #ChurchRapes
- Swami Chidanandapuri on “Why Hindu Need a Vote Bank?”
- Forgotten Temples Of Malappuram – Part I (Nalambalam of Ramapuram)
Responses