Has the country moved on?
20/10/2010 14:17:51  U Narayanadas

In reply to a tweet on September 29, this writer replied that he was a firm believer and hoped that a grand temple for Bhagavan Sri Ram would be built at His birth place. He added that the issue was very complex, likely to extend the sagacity of the Honourable judges to the very limits. But in the end everyone hoped for a judgement that would make all parties exclaim “A Daniel come to judgment...” as both Shylock and Portia did in different scenes of “The Merchant of Venice.” Incidentally the central theme of the Shakespeare play, according to literary critics, was a plea for toleration!

MSM: ‘REWIND, FREEZE FRAME’

Till 4 P.M. on September 30 our main stream media – the Pravdas and Izvestias of the print medium and the electronic equivalents of Radio Moscow of the USSR days - educated us that

1.     The higher judiciary is seized of the Janmastahn - Masjid a. k. a Sri Rama Janma Bhumi – Babri Masjid dispute.

2.     The issue concerns merely the title of the land on which the disputed structure stood.

3.     Courts can not resolve issues based on matters of faith.

4.     What concerns courts is evidence and only evidence.

5.     “The country has moved on”. What was left unsaid was in its view ‘the pro-temple movement has no case’, and hence the “exhortation”to the “intransigent” pro-temple movement.

6.     Everyone should respect the verdict of the Honourable High Court.

7.     The losing side, which they have already determined was the pro-temple movement should understand that the hearing by / verdict of the Honourable High Court is only another step in the judicial process to resolve the issue.

Although they have been exhorting the wining side not to gloat about victory, it was merely for form. Champagne bottles were ready as were proclamations to be issued of their “eternal faith” in the Indian judicial system.

Remember, in its view ‘the pro-temple movement has no case’.

8.     Even after adjudication by the Supreme Court, the pro-temple movement should understand that the country has moved on. Remember, in its view ‘the pro-temple movement has no case’.

9.     As the country has moved on what concerns the youth of this country are more mundane matters than Mandir & Masjid.

The chivalrous concession of mentioning Mandir first was because in our MSM’s view, ‘the pro-temple movement had no case’. Remember Winston Churchill’s famous quote, “Magnanimity in victory; courage in defeat and balance in adversity…”

The English electronic media crowed on and on, ad nauseum that ‘the country has moved on’ till the newscasters’ voices became hoarse and throats ached.

It is reliably learnt that NPIL, the company that makes Strepsils throat lozenges sold out all stocks of the brand in the last two weeks. When last heard, in order to meet the unprecedented demand, the company commissioned running extra batches paying its workers overtime wages.

At about 4.30 P.M. all hell broke lose on the electronic media. The country stopped moving on, rewound to December 6, 1992 and the frame froze.

The print progressives had to wait for the morrow. To be fair the two newspapers that this writer reads, The New Indian Express and the Deccan Chronicle had balanced coverage and editorials on the next day.

If for secular historians India’s history began after Mohd. Ghaznavi’s first “visit” to Somnath, for the modern pall-bearers of secularism, India’s history began on December 6, 1992.

If a panellist tried to point out that the issue before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court was not December 6, 1992 but “merely the title of the land on which the disputed structure stood”, he was shouted down. The fact that all the three judges unanimously threw out the “title suit” was submerged in an avalanche of denunciations of the judgement.

The earlier edict, “everyone should respect the verdict of the Honourable High Court” was discarded. Those who cried “India has moved on” till just thirty minutes before now cried a halt and reversed the engine like time-travellers zeroing in on a moment in time. Like the proverbial four blind men describing an elephant, the dissection began without any of the dissectors reading the eight thousand page verdict. The three judges comprising the bench chose to deliver their own independent judgments and the smallest  of these delivered by Justice S. U. Khan ran into 285 pages.

DISMISSAL OF TITLE SUIT CONCLUSIVE

Before we proceed any further, since the original dispute was about “merely the title of the land” let us try to understand what a “title” means to the layman. If one understands correctly, title means ownership. Thus when a property is sold or purchased the ownership or title is transferred, by executing a title deed. A title can thus be sold or purchased but also bequeathed or gifted by executing a title deed.

There appear to be many litigants claiming title in the instant case but let us confine ourselves to the three principal litigants. They are the Hindu Mahasabha representing if one understands correctly the “Ram Lalla Virajman”, the Nirmohi Akhara, which some believe is a proxy for the Congress party and the Sunni Wakq Board which have been fighting for a title for the 1500 square yard piece of land on which the mosque was presumably constructed in 1528, by Babar’s commander Mir Baki, a Shia – after destroying the pre-existing temple. This is the reason why it was always referred to as the Janmasthan-Mosque, till the pseudo-secular historians and their fellow-travellers in the media began calling it the Babri - Masjid or more charitably the Rama Janma Bhumi - Babri – Masjid.

Now the question arises as to how Mir Baki came into the title or to simplify the language who gave him the title? Did he simply plant a few flags in the four corners of the land and staked his claim as the Anglo-Saxons did when they moved to America in droves after Columbus set out to discover India but stumbled upon the West Indies instead. If Columbus hadn’t lost his way the Anglo-Saxons would have had done their staking here in India and history would have been different. But the question remains, “who gave Mir Baki the title to the land?” Or are simple legal principles not applicable to invaders and conquerors and they can usurp any land anywhere?

It is not that the Hindus have given up hope or title. They have been claiming / fighting for title to the site of the destroyed temple, whenever they had some strength although they were fighting a far superior enemy. The original suit or suits in the RJB-BM dispute concerning the title or ownership of the land were filed in the Faizabad District Civil Court. The modern litigation began as far back as in 1885 during the reign of the British administration. However it appears the British-India Civil courts which adjudicated the matter in 1936 a full fifty one years since the litigation began and awarded the title to the Sunni Wakq Board.

Now the second question arises, ‘how come the Sunni Wakq Board came into the title?’ Who gave the SWB the title to the land? If Mir Baki did, why did he give to Sunnis rather than Shias which was naturally to be expected?

Now the third question, how did the British simply adjudicate the matter and award the title to the SWB? Did they too stake claim as did the earlier conqueror, Babar / Mir Baki or did they think they had come into the title by simply usurping all land and therefore were eligible to gift it to the more favourite claimant? Why did they not ask, “How did the SWB come into the title?” They simply seem to have proceeded on the “possession is title” principle and awarded it to the SWB, thus creating another legal landmine.

Now in 2010, the three Honourable judges too applied the same principle “possession is title” in magnanimously awarding the three claimants equal share of the disputed land having first dismissed the title suits on the principle of ‘limitation of time’ in filing the suits.

ISN'T IT TIME TO MOVE ON


One should understand that once the title claims of two of the three litigants were dismissed on the principle of ‘limitation of time’, the third party, in this case “Ram Lalla Virajman” ipso facto becomes the automatic winner of the title. The learned judges therefore could have declared “Ram Lalla Virajman” the winner of the title but in their infinite wisdom have gone beyond that. They wanted India to win by bridging the deep chasm between Hindus and Muslims that is likely to tear civil society asunder.

There is no need to go into the ample archaeological evidence that bespoke of the existence of a massive temple under the mosque. The archaeological evidence points to a grand Vishnu Hari temple that was in existence much prior to the Sunga Dynasty which Babar himself proclaimed to have defeated. In fact the evidence gathered dates back to the Gupta Dynasty. This evidence of a pre-existing temple was clinching enough for the majority judgement to conclude that the mosque was built on the ruins of a destroyed temple.

This is the time for India’s two major religions to bury their differences and historical baggage and to move forward in a spirit of mutual trust and goodwill. The Shias, to which sect the original protagonist of the mosque saga Mir Baki belonged, offered an olive branch to the Hindus. They even offered a donation of Rs 15, 00,000 for the construction of the ‘Bhavya Mandir’.

It is now for the country to decide whether it intends to ‘move on’ or remain hostage to the machinations of a bigoted media which abjured all moral values in pursuit of social snobbery!

TAIL-PIECE


The panel discussions on most English language television channels were more or less on expected lines, the only difference being the degree of rabidity of views expressed. Some friends point out that the Hindi news channels STAR and ZEE had more balanced coverage. The star on the Hindu side was undoubtedly Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad (also a lawyer representing “Ram Lalla”), who roundly ticked off the puffed-up Divas.

But the debates on NDTV were more rabid than others. The prima donna of these debates is of course Ms. Barkha Dutt and the more notable panellists were the Lawyer of the Sunni Wakq Board, Mr. Assaduddin Owaisi and Ms. Farah Naqvi. The first two featured on all channels. Another feature which NDTV shares with all others was that it did not have any lawyer representing the other litigants, something which has parallels with TV debates on the M. F. Hussain case.

In one of Barkha’s panel discussions, after Ravi Shankar Prasad roundly ticked her off, Mr. Javed Akthar pointed out that only Hindus could be accused of pseudo-secularism but not Muslims, who can only be 'fundamentalist'. He was only trying to be jocular but unwittingly stumbled upon some element of truth. This is not to say that all Muslims are fundamentalist or all Hindus are pseudo-secular. By the strange logic of social snobbery, in the perception of the intelligentsia, all Hindus are considered communal till they prove their secular credentials by denouncing Hindu culture, Hindu traditions, Hindu religion and all fellow Hindus who avow their faith in them. But by the same logic of social snobbery, all Muslims are considered secular irrespective of their precept and practice. It is not too difficult to understand why this should be so.

Firstly for Barkha, Mr. Soli Sarabjee who must be twice her age was just Soli but Owaisi was always ‘sab’! Aren’t some animals in Orwell’s Animal Farm, ‘more equal’ than others? And at least in one debate she prefaced her question to Owaisi, with ‘Insha Allah’.

Secondly, every one knows the provenance of MIM, which Owaisi represents, as the successor to the Razakars. It still follows some ‘Razakar’ methods. In the 2009 general election, Owaisi himself was caught on camera chasing and thrashing an election agent of the TDP. His brother Akabaruddin was in the group that thrashed Tasleema Nasreen and at least one MIM MLA ( the same, who headed the group that thrashed Tasleema Nasreen) brandished a gun and fired in the air when GHMC employees went to demolish an unauthorised building (not a mosque) in Abids. Akabaruddin openly professed, on record on camera, that if Tasleema ever set foot again on the soil of Hyderabad, she would be beheaded. That’s right, ‘beheaded’. Mr. Kasu Krishna Reddy, the Civil Supplies minister in the erstwhile YSR government was booted out when he went to inspect government-run fair price shops in the old city. The old city of Hyderabad is MIM bailiwick and nobody should doubt it.

This then is the secular Muslim face that is often seen on Barkha’s debates. That the methods adopted by MIM work, no one need doubt. Begum Barkha and her cohorts in other news channels are only too aware that the party or for that matter any Muslim organisation is not to be trifled with. Hence the deference, nay reverence to them. On the other hand the merest of protest earns the Hindus the endearing epithet, ‘goons’.

One occasionally sees Farah Naqvi as an articulate, fluent-English-speaking female Muslim face on TV. But she should be remembered more for an article she wrote in Deccan Chronicle some time ago. In it, she rather breezily advanced the theory that the issue of Kashmiri Pandits has been ‘highly romanticised’. According to her, the Pandits have been doing rather well – in the camps or out of them - having assimilated into civilian life during the last twenty years.

Both Owaisi and Naqvi dispel the popular misconception that only bearded Mullahs and impoverished Muslims take to militant religious activism. For, Owaisi belongs to the upper crust of the society being a part of the ruling establishment of the erstwhile Nizam State. He studied law in London. And from all appearances Naqvi must belong to at least the upper-middle class if not above.


P.S.: See The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion for reading interesting excerpts from the LB-AHC judgement. They include cross examination transcripts of the evidence tendered  by the 'secular' historians, archaeologists and other witnesses and also the judges' observations which nailed the 'Eminences' and exposed their lies. Special mention must be made of the contribution of “Chaanakya” who has painstakingly waded through the voluminous judgement and pieced together relevant excerpts to enable us  to understand it.

Bookmark and Share

Share on Facebook



 
  
U. NARAYANADAS
21/10/2010 21:29:54
HAS THE COUNTRY MOVED ON?
WRT the PS mentioned in the article:

"The Ram Janmbhoomi Verdict: News and Discussion" mentioned may be viewed here:

href=http://forums.bharat-rakshak.com/search.php?search_id=egosearch
5
bahubali
21/10/2010 03:30:01
Owaisi's Talent

This is for the readers to understand what the owaisi B@#$%^ds are made of

http://www.deccanchronicle.com/hyderabad/owaisi-brothers-go-wild-897 5
skg
20/10/2010 17:33:05
Hindus must use the tactics of Shivaji Maharaj !!.
Hindus must learn from the tactics played by Shivaji Maharaj in dealing with the powerful enemy in the form of Mughal empire. Superb intelligence, wit and guerilla techniques were used by Shivaji to counter Aurangazeb and Muslim army. Hindus must use intelligence, courage and muscle power when required to take on the enemies deeply planted in Congress Party , Media and Communists.
Ofcourse, the sages and sants must use extreme intelligence in the supreme court to get a verdict which will be satisfactory to the Hindus. Getting a verdict is based on whom they choose to represent them in the Supreme court. If required they must hire the best of the breed lawyers to fight the case. This is not exaggeration. To fight the case they must be willing to spend atleast 20% of the money collected for building the Ram temple. I hope my fellow Hindus will support my ideas in fighting the land at Ayodhya. I hope Sadhus and Sants have a strong strategy in fighting the case in Supreme Court of India. Good Luck this time. Hope they won't fail the sentiments and the feelings of the Hindus.
The English media is playing the role of prostitution in India. Mr. Owaisi is a number one educated criminal terrorist who made the old city of Hyderabad a law less land.
As far as Farah Naqvi is concerned she is simply a hypocrite. She is only speaking the one side of the story on the TV for the fear of Jihadis, Mullahs and Clerics . If she speaks against Islam and its interests her head will be beheaded and she knews that and that is why she is playing a safe game. Hindus must not give any chance this time to any body in the case of Ayodhya. History will not forgive Hindus if they loose the land in Ayodhya. Hindus must do whatever is necessary to build a good temple at Ayodhya. Jai Hind. 5
No meaningful dialogue can be held with Pakistan until it abandons the use of terrorism as an instrument of its foreign policy.

Atal Bihari Vajpayee

TOP STORIES
Watch NaMo latest interview.
No one can stop the rise of a visionary. Must watch interview of NaMo.
Jihadi call to support AAP & Congress to defeat Narendra Modi.
Protest : Big Bazaar advertisement insulting Hindu Dharma
Man murdered by Muslim friends over live in relationship with Muslim woman
Renowned Surgeon Dr.Devi Shetty: "Narendra Modi can deliver, has clear vision on how India should be run
Modi's today's explosive and exhaustive interview to ANI
No wonder, Antonia is able to get away with NONSENSE
'Modi is not a politician. He is a Statesman'. - Dr.B.M.Hegde
SDPI terrorists attack BJP candidate in Tanjavur
The Biggest Interview of 2014 with Narendra Modi in TV9
Christian Vishu - Heights of Inculturation and Hypocrisy.
Result of rise in Muslim demography; Jihadi fight among themselves in Taliparamba riots
Final leap towards Janam TV - Suresh Gopi to launch logo, in the presence of socio-cultural leaders
Opinion poll: BJP and allies cross 272 mark
Priyanka Gandhi drinks too much alcohol and has a bad name, says Subramanian Swamy.
Kudos to Nationalist tweeples; #AbKiBaarModiSarkaar continuously trending in twitter.
Exclusively for secular Hindus.
Narendra Modi : Give me 60 Months and Will give you a Life of Peace and Happiness.
I won't have any issues in taking support from Mukhtar Ansari: Kejriwal
Narendra Modi in Aap Ki Adalat 2014, Full Episode
Celebrity Tamil novelist supports Narendra Modi, gets threat
Modi effect: 2,000-odd RSS shakhas sprout in 3 months
CPM's secret circular espouses Anti Hindu agenda
Narendra Modi in Aap Ki Adalat, Full Episode.
Sanjay Baru's book puts forth sensational claims about UPA govt
'Informer-Cop Nexus Behind TN Islamic Fundamentalism'
Bill on Banning Conversion - Sign the petition
Ishrat Jahan Conspiracy, the full untold story. Disseminate widely in the interest of our national security.
Muslims won Kargil for India, not Hindus:SP leader Azam Khan
AAP candidate against Sonia Gandhi withdraws.
AAP Ka Sach jhoot bole kauwa kaate
Secular Exam paper - Which holy book teaches 'Love'?
British Army Given a talk on the Bhagavad Gita
Muslims frown over Kumar Vishwas' pro-RSS comments
Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat - BJP Manifesto 2014
Now we know what is happening with Ford foundation's hefty donations to AAP
Sashi Tharoor hobnobs with Christian power brokers, Ask them to threaten laity by demonising Modi
Tale of two Manifestos: BJP vs Congress
AAP wants to strike a deal with largest party: AAP leader
Family of deceased Keralite MBBS student urges for fresh probe.
NaMo - The visionary.
Why India needs a strong government at the centre
Possible scenarios for UPA-3
Don't be a fence sitter! Vote! Vote Responsibly! Vote for Namo !- Rajeev Chandrasekhar
Narendra Modi's Vision and Priorities - Interview
Aadhar - biggest Social Scam on the Planet Earth, says Dr Swamy
Why BJP?
Kerala Demograhy - 'Islamic Surge' across Kerala
VHP launches, India Health line in Delhi
Kerala Home Minister's inflammatory article against Narendra Modi
Muslim goons on a rampage against Hindus in Ullal
They Divide, We Unite
Decoding Modi : Watch unseen aspects of Modi's life
Parameswarji on - Why Janam?
Journalist and ex-Congress MP M J Akbar on why he chose to join BJP
Chetan Bhagat's Analyse on ''The Modi Effect'
Congress Panic at “Whirlwind” Muslims Support for NaMo
BJP launches Raksha app to aid women security
Yogendra Yadav on Gujarat development before he became AAP leader
Before Voting please remember the following statements
14 Myths about RSS : writes Kiran Kumar S.
Jamaat-e-Islami Hind's constitution is unconstitutional, Kerala govt says
Christian Good News Vs Hindu Good News ; Explained by Rajiv Malhotra
Kannur Seva Appeal - Stand up for the families of those who sacrificed their lives for the nation.
Trader launches 'The Namo Store' for Narendra Modi merchandise
Kerala Church showers praises on Modi
Will Joyalukkas make-up mother mary an ad figure ?
Their Last Journey - Heartbreaking cattle trafficking in Kerala
HK Seva update- Thanks for your support!
We are not interested in 2002, We are interested in 2022
I respect Sangh Activist's dedication for the Nation - Justice VR Krishna Iyer
Ready to join hands with HK ? - An Appeal
Nandettan exposes Marxist hatred towards Swami Vivekananda - Janam Video Report
13.45% growth rate in Muslim dominated Mallapuram while Kerala only have 4.86% growth rate
At Tirunelveli, 200 Christians Come Back to Hindu Fold





About Us | Contribute | Feedback
All rights reserved. © 2005 - 2011. www.haindavakeralam.org